David I. King

4.5k citations
143 papers · 3.3k · h-index 34

Impact in

Papers in

David I. King

132 papers receiving 3.0k citations

Peers

David I. King
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Ecological Modeling 704
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 1.3k
  • Ecology 2.4k
  • Developmental Biology 149
  • Global and Planetary Change 1.1k
Replace Stuart J. Marsden with:
Stuart J. Marsden United Kingdom
Robert B. Blair United States
Matthew D. Johnson United States
Torbjørn Haugaasen Norway
Adriano Pereira Paglia Brazil
Claudia E. Moreno Mexico
Luc Barbaro France
Lincoln Fishpool United Kingdom
Douglas F. Stotz United States
Marc‐André Villard Canada
David I. King relative to Stuart J. Marsden United Kingdom Stuart J. Marsden's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Stuart J. Marsden · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David I. King

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David I. King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David I. King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David I. King more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David I. King

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David I. King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David I. King. The network helps show where David I. King may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David I. King, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David I. King Line = papers co-authored together David I. King links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 143 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011186
2 2006155
3 2014119
4 2003107
5 2000102
6 2013101
7 199698
8 201493
9 199986
10 201779
11 200961
12 200858
13 201157
14 200953
15 199352
16 201151
17 200150
18 199849
19 200948
20 201346

About David I. King

David I. King is a scholar working on Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Ecological Modeling, having authored 143 papers that have together received 3.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Avian ecology and behavior (69 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (51 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (44 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (36 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (34 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (31 papers), Plant and animal studies (26 papers) and Animal Behavior and Reproduction (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (704 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (1.3k citations), Ecology (2.4k citations), Developmental Biology (149 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (1.1k citations). David I. King has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Mexico and Malawi. Frequent co-authors include Richard M. DeGraaf, Richard B. Chandler, Scott Schlossberg, Curtice R. Griffin, John H. Rappole, Michael E. Akresh, J. Andrew Royle, William V. DeLuca, John P. Buonaccorsi and Sonya K. Auer. Their work appears in journals such as Forest Ecology and Management, Journal of Wildlife Management, Ecology and Evolution, Conservation Biology and Journal of Field Ornithology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact