Mark Bonta

506 citations
27 papers · 243 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Bonta

25 papers receiving 219 citations

Peers

Mark Bonta
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Ecological Modeling 32
  • Geography, Planning and Development 26
  • Horticulture 4
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 67
  • Ecology 67
Replace Hirokazu Yasuoka with:
Hirokazu Yasuoka Japan
Yance de Fretes Indonesia
Shafqat Hussain United States
Hēmi Whaanga New Zealand
Abdul Haris Mustari Indonesia
Bruno Garcia Luize Brazil
David Quammen United States
Bill Adams United States
Nigel Scott New Zealand
Adriano Jerozolimski Brazil
Mark Bonta relative to Hirokazu Yasuoka Japan Hirokazu Yasuoka's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Hirokazu Yasuoka · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Bonta

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Bonta's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Bonta with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Bonta more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Bonta

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Bonta. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Bonta. The network helps show where Mark Bonta may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Mark Bonta, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Bonta Line = papers co-authored together Mark Bonta links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201767
2 200426
3 201920
4 201015
5 201114
6 201912
7 200611
8 201210
9
Birding Honduras : a checklist and guide
200310
10 20049
11
VALORIZING THE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN PEOPLE AND BIRDS: EXPERIENCES AND LESSONS FROM HONDURAS
20087
12 20125
13 20185
14 20114
15 20074
16 20074
17 20184
18 20123
19 20093
20 20073

About Mark Bonta

Mark Bonta is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Ecology, Plant Science, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Anthropology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 243 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Botany and Geology in Latin America and Caribbean (10 papers), Environmental and Cultural Studies in Latin America and Beyond (6 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (3 papers), Plant and soil sciences (3 papers), Ethnobotanical and Medicinal Plants Studies (3 papers), Anthropological Studies and Insights (2 papers), Latin American and Latino Studies (2 papers) and Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (32 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (26 citations), Horticulture (4 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (67 citations) and Ecology (67 citations). Mark Bonta has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Mexico and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include John Protevi, J. L. Haynes, Andrew P. Vovides, Daniel A. Graham, María Teresa Pulido Silva, Angélica Cibrián‐Jaramillo, Spencer G. Lucas, Guillermo E. Alvarado, Juan Antonio Reyes‐Agüero and Laura Yáñez‐Espinosa. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Ethnobiology, Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, Journal of Historical Geography, Geoforum and GeoJournal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact