Ruth Croxton

877 citations
26 papers · 634 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Ruth Croxton

25 papers receiving 618 citations

Peers

Ruth Croxton
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Safety Research 413
  • Toxicology 83
  • Genetics 342
  • Archeology 87
  • Signal Processing 60
Replace Robert Ramotowski with:
Robert Ramotowski United States
Marcel de Puit Netherlands
Leesa Ferguson United Kingdom
Rosalind Wolstenholme United Kingdom
Catia Costa United Kingdom
Vaughn G. Sears United Kingdom
Xanthe Spindler Australia
Milutin Stoilovic Australia
Roberto S.P. King United Kingdom
M Azoury Israel
Ruth Croxton relative to Robert Ramotowski United States Robert Ramotowski's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Robert Ramotowski · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ruth Croxton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth Croxton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth Croxton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth Croxton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth Croxton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth Croxton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth Croxton. The network helps show where Ruth Croxton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ruth Croxton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ruth Croxton Line = papers co-authored together Ruth Croxton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010184
2 201280
3 200454
4 200650
5 201239
6 202035
7 201833
8 201724
9 201123
10
Fingerprint Development Techniques: Theory and Application
201822
11 201118
12 201617
13 20219
14 20197
15
Evaluation of the dimethylaminocinnemaldehyde contact transfer process and its application to fingerprint development on thermal papers
20097
16 20245
17
Applications of remote sensing in agriculture and forestry.
19705
18 20204
19 20223
20 20113

About Ruth Croxton

Ruth Croxton is a scholar working on Safety Research, Genetics, Toxicology, Information Systems and Archeology, having authored 26 papers that have together received 634 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forensic Fingerprint Detection Methods (11 papers), Forensic and Genetic Research (8 papers), Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (6 papers), Digital and Cyber Forensics (4 papers), Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (2 papers), Biometric Identification and Security (2 papers), Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis (2 papers) and Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Safety Research (413 citations), Toxicology (83 citations), Genetics (342 citations), Archeology (87 citations) and Signal Processing (60 citations). Ruth Croxton has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Spain and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Mark Baron, Terry Kent, Vaughn G. Sears, David Butler, Stephen M. Bleay, Marcel de Puit, Simona Francese, Melanie J. Bailey, José González-Rodrı́guez and Mathieu Elie. Their work appears in journals such as Forensic Science International, Journal of Forensic Sciences, Science & Justice, Applied Spectroscopy and Analytical Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact