Jonathan J. Cooper
Impact in
- Equine top 0.2%
- Veterinary Equine Medical Research
- Small Animals top 0.05%
- Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Papers in
-
- Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies 50
- Genetics 30
- Human-Animal Interaction Studies 26
- Co-authors
- Georgia Mason (9 shared papers)Daniel S. Mills (20 shared papers)Christine J Nicol (6 shared papers)Michael C. Appleby (4 shared papers)M. C. Appleby (2 shared papers)Frank Ödberg (1 shared paper)H.P.B. Davidson (2 shared papers)Sarah Bishop (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Applied Animal Behaviour Science (13 papers)Animal Welfare (7 papers)British Poultry Science (6 papers)Animal Behaviour (4 papers)Equine Veterinary Journal (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomNetherlandsAustralia
In The Last Decade
Jonathan J. Cooper
82 papers receiving 2.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 129
- Equine 587
- Small Animals 1.8k
- Animal Science and Zoology 1.1k
- Developmental Biology 89
- Genetics 827
Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan J. Cooper
This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan J. Cooper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan J. Cooper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan J. Cooper more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan J. Cooper
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan J. Cooper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan J. Cooper. The network helps show where Jonathan J. Cooper may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan J. Cooper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 86 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2001 | 224 | |
| 2 | 2000 | 126 | |
| 3 | 2003 | 107 | |
| 4 | 2004 | 97 | |
| 5 | 2002 | 94 | |
| 6 | 2005 | 93 | |
| 7 | 1998 | 87 | |
| 8 | 2003 | 87 | |
| 9 | 2001 | 82 | |
| 10 | 1963 | 75 | |
| 11 | 1996 | 74 | |
| 12 | 1996 | 65 | |
| 13 | 1995 | 65 | |
| 14 | 1991 | 64 | |
| 15 | 2003 | 59 | |
| 16 | 2016 | 59 | |
| 17 | 2004 | 58 | |
| 18 | 2000 | 56 | |
| 19 | 2004 | 54 | |
| 20 | 1996 | 52 |
About Jonathan J. Cooper
Jonathan J. Cooper is a scholar working on Small Animals, Genetics, Animal Science and Zoology, Social Psychology and Equine, having authored 86 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (50 papers), Human-Animal Interaction Studies (26 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (22 papers), Veterinary Equine Medical Research (12 papers), Livestock and Poultry Management (7 papers), Primate Behavior and Ecology (6 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (6 papers) and Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Equine (587 citations), Small Animals (1.8k citations), Animal Science and Zoology (1.1k citations), Developmental Biology (89 citations) and Genetics (827 citations). Jonathan J. Cooper has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Georgia Mason, Daniel S. Mills, Christine J Nicol, Michael C. Appleby, M. C. Appleby, Frank Ödberg, H.P.B. Davidson, Sarah Bishop, Robert J. Young and Rafael Freire. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Animal Behaviour Science, Animal Welfare, British Poultry Science, Animal Behaviour and Equine Veterinary Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.