Hannah F. Wright

589 citations
10 papers · 460 · h-index 10

Impact in

    • Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Genetics top 5%
    • Human-Animal Interaction Studies

Papers in

    • Human-Animal Interaction Studies 8
    • Family and Disability Support Research 3
    • Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies 2

Hannah F. Wright

10 papers receiving 445 citations

Peers

Hannah F. Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Small Animals 140
  • Genetics 360
  • Pharmacy 57
  • Geography, Planning and Development 35
  • Virology 25
Replace Lisa Wallis with:
Lisa Wallis Hungary
Victoria Brelsford United Kingdom
Lauren Brubaker United States
Natalia Albuquerque Brazil
Niwako Ogata United States
Erica N. Feuerbacher United States
Roxanne D. Hawkins United Kingdom
Elyssa Payne Australia
Fabricio Carballo Argentina
Carine Savalli Brazil
Hannah F. Wright relative to Lisa Wallis Hungary Lisa Wallis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Lisa Wallis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Hannah F. Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hannah F. Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hannah F. Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hannah F. Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hannah F. Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hannah F. Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hannah F. Wright. The network helps show where Hannah F. Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Hannah F. Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Hannah F. Wright Line = papers co-authored together Hannah F. Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 201195
2 201186
3 201553
4
Development and validation of a psychometric tool for assessing impulsivity in the domestic dog (Canis familiaris)
201149
5 201639
6 201735
7 201633
8 201428
9 201727
10 202215

About Hannah F. Wright

Hannah F. Wright is a scholar working on Genetics, Clinical Psychology, Small Animals, Social Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 10 papers that have together received 460 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Human-Animal Interaction Studies (8 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (3 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (2 papers), Infant Health and Development (2 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (2 papers), Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies (2 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (2 papers) and Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Small Animals (140 citations), Genetics (360 citations), Pharmacy (57 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (35 citations) and Virology (25 citations). Hannah F. Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Daniel S. Mills, Petra M.J. Pollux, Sophie Hall, Helen Zulch, Richard Mills, Sarah Ellis, Ruth Croxton, Anna Wilkinson, Gillian C. Hall and Tendai Mugwagwa. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Physiology & Behavior, Journal of Medical Economics, Scientific Reports and Journal of Veterinary Behavior.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact