Ruth Chang
Impact in
- Philosophy top 0.2%
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- General Decision Sciences top 5%
- Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Papers in
- Philosophy 15
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory 9
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 8
-
- Free Will and Agency 9
- Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment 2
- Co-authors
- Bernard Gert (1 shared paper)Anne Smith (4 shared papers)Amity Campbell (4 shared papers)Mark J. Hancock (4 shared papers)Peter O’Sullivan (4 shared papers)Lesa Hoffman (2 shared papers)Peter Kent (3 shared papers)Jan Hartvigsen (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy (3 papers)Philosophical Issues (2 papers)Ethics (2 papers)Ratio (1 paper)Philosophical Perspectives (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Ruth Chang
21 papers receiving 971 citations
Ruth Chang's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
- Philosophy 566
- General Decision Sciences 88
- Cognitive Neuroscience 353
- History and Philosophy of Science 73
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 190
Countries citing papers authored by Ruth Chang
This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth Chang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth Chang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth Chang more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth Chang
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth Chang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth Chang. The network helps show where Ruth Chang may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 13 scholars most cited alongside Ruth Chang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Incommensurability, incomparability, and practical reason Hit paper breakdown → | 1997 | 385 |
| 2 | 2002 | 234 | |
| 3 | 2004 | 159 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 70 | |
| 5 | 2005 | 58 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 51 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 36 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 35 | |
| 9 | 2012 | 29 | |
| 10 | 2015 | 27 | |
| 11 | 2015 | 27 | |
| 12 | 2001 | 16 | |
| 13 | 2020 | 14 | |
| 14 | 2001 | 11 | |
| 15 | 2023 | 8 | |
| 16 | 2016 | 6 | |
| 17 | 1998 | 6 | |
| 18 | 2024 | 4 | |
| 19 | 2001 | 4 | |
| 20 | 2009 | 2 |
About Ruth Chang
Ruth Chang is a scholar working on Philosophy, Cognitive Neuroscience, Political Science and International Relations, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Pharmacology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Free Will and Agency (9 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (9 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (8 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (5 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (5 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (4 papers), Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment (3 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (566 citations), General Decision Sciences (88 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (353 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (73 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (190 citations). Ruth Chang has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Bernard Gert, Anne Smith, Amity Campbell, Mark J. Hancock, Peter O’Sullivan, Lesa Hoffman, Peter Kent, Jan Hartvigsen, J.P. Cañeiro and Robert Schütze. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy, Philosophical Issues, Ethics, Ratio and Philosophical Perspectives.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.