Robert Laird
Impact in
- Pharmacology top 1%
- Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Papers in
-
- Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation 9
- Surgery 1
- Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment 1
- Co-authors
- Peter Kent (9 shared papers)Jennifer L. Keating (5 shared papers)Terry Haines (3 shared papers)Alison H. McGregor (3 shared papers)Peter O’Sullivan (4 shared papers)Anne Smith (4 shared papers)Amity Campbell (4 shared papers)Mark J. Hancock (4 shared papers)
- Journals
- BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders (6 papers)The Lancet Rheumatology (1 paper)BMJ Open (1 paper)Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy (1 paper)The Lancet (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaDenmarkUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Robert Laird
9 papers receiving 741 citations
Robert Laird's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
- Pharmacology 543
- Medical Laboratory Technology 15
- Occupational Therapy 39
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 127
- Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 29
Countries citing papers authored by Robert Laird
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Laird's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Laird with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Laird more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Laird
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Laird. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Laird. The network helps show where Robert Laird may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 16 scholars most cited alongside Robert Laird, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Comparing lumbo-pelvic kinematics in people with and without back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis Hit paper breakdown → | 2014 | 318 |
| 2 | Cognitive functional therapy with or without movement sensor biofeedback versus usual care for chronic, disabling low back pain (RESTORE): a randomised, controlled, three-arm, parallel group, phase 3, clinical trial Hit paper breakdown → | 2023 | 109 |
| 3 | 2015 | 84 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 63 | |
| 5 | 2012 | 57 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 52 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 46 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 29 | |
| 9 | 2024 | 4 | |
| 10 | 2025 | 0 |
About Robert Laird
Robert Laird is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Cell Biology and Infectious Diseases, having authored 10 papers that have together received 762 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (9 papers), Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment (1 paper), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (1 paper) and Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (543 citations), Medical Laboratory Technology (15 citations), Occupational Therapy (39 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (127 citations) and Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (29 citations). Robert Laird has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Denmark and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Peter Kent, Jennifer L. Keating, Terry Haines, Alison H. McGregor, Peter O’Sullivan, Anne Smith, Amity Campbell, Mark J. Hancock, Jan Hartvigsen and J.P. Cañeiro. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, The Lancet Rheumatology, BMJ Open, Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy and The Lancet.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.