Ruining Jin

26 papers receiving 202 citations

Peers

Ruining Jin
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Health Informatics 4
  • Communication 17
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 25
  • Family Practice 2
  • Social Psychology 23
Replace Alessandro Del Ponte with:
Alessandro Del Ponte United States
Marcela Alina Fărcașiu Romania
Nurzali Ismail Malaysia
Lisa Garbe Germany
Sarah Dillon United Kingdom
Noemi Peter Netherlands
Siti Irene Astuti Dwiningrum Indonesia
Danilo Jr. Rogayan Philippines
Marcos Pedro Ramos Rodríguez Ecuador
Sanna Ahvenharju Finland
Ruining Jin relative to Alessandro Del Ponte United States Alessandro Del Ponte's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×
Alessandro Del Ponte · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ruining Jin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ruining Jin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruining Jin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruining Jin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ruining Jin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruining Jin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruining Jin. The network helps show where Ruining Jin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Ruining Jin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ruining Jin Line = papers co-authored together Ruining Jin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202226
2 202324
3 202321
4 202317
5 202217
6 202314
7 202410
8 20238
9 20248
10 20237
11 20247
12 20237
13 20236
14 20225
15 20245
16 20244
17 20244
18 20234
19 20243
20 20232

About Ruining Jin

Ruining Jin is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Communication and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 28 papers that have together received 207 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy (4 papers), Migration and Labor Dynamics (3 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (2 papers), Animal and Plant Science Education (2 papers), International Student and Expatriate Challenges (2 papers), Diaspora, migration, transnational identity (2 papers), Media Influence and Health (2 papers) and Cultural Differences and Values (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (4 citations), Communication (17 citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (25 citations), Family Practice (2 citations) and Social Psychology (23 citations). Ruining Jin has collaborated with scholars based in China, Vietnam and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Tam-Tri Le, Minh‐Hoang Nguyen, Quan‐Hoang Vuong, Wang Xiao, Viet‐Phuong La, Thu‐Trang Vuong, Quy Van Khuc, Jie Wei, Giang Hoang and Giang Truong Hoang. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Psychology, Sustainability, International Journal of Intercultural Relations, MethodsX and Thinking Skills and Creativity.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact