Ruining Jin

27 papers receiving 192 citations

Peers

Ruining Jin
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Health Informatics 4
  • Communication 16
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 23
  • Social Psychology 25
  • Family Practice 2
Replace Marcela Alina Fărcașiu with:
Marcela Alina Fărcașiu Romania
Toss Gascoigne Australia
Luísa Aires Portugal
Eglė Butkevičienė Lithuania
Abdulelah A. Alghamdi Saudi Arabia
João Amado Portugal
Sibele D. Aquino Brazil
Lisa Garbe Germany
Sanna Ahvenharju Finland
Ulf Fredriksson Sweden
Ruining Jin relative to Marcela Alina Fărcașiu Romania Marcela Alina Fărcașiu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Marcela Alina Fărcașiu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ruining Jin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ruining Jin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruining Jin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruining Jin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ruining Jin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruining Jin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruining Jin. The network helps show where Ruining Jin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Ruining Jin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ruining Jin Line = papers co-authored together Ruining Jin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202225
2 202324
3 202320
4 202216
5 202313
6 202311
7 20249
8 20248
9 20237
10 20237
11 20247
12 20236
13 20236
14 20235
15 20244
16 20244
17 20243
18 20243
19 20223
20 20233

About Ruining Jin

Ruining Jin is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Education and Communication, having authored 29 papers that have together received 194 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy (4 papers), Migration and Labor Dynamics (3 papers), Diaspora, migration, transnational identity (2 papers), International Student and Expatriate Challenges (2 papers), Animal and Plant Science Education (2 papers), Media Influence and Health (2 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (2 papers) and Cultural Differences and Values (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (4 citations), Communication (16 citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (23 citations), Social Psychology (25 citations) and Family Practice (2 citations). Ruining Jin has collaborated with scholars based in China, Vietnam and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Tam-Tri Le, Minh‐Hoang Nguyen, Quan‐Hoang Vuong, Wang Xiao, Viet‐Phuong La, Thu‐Trang Vuong, Quy Van Khuc, Jie Wei, Giang Hoang and Xuanyi Wang. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Psychology, Sustainability, International Journal of Intercultural Relations, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health and Frontiers in Public Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact