Noemi Peter
Impact in
- General Decision Sciences top 10%
- Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Safety Research top 5%
- Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
Papers in
-
- Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies 5
-
- Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics 2
- Gender Diversity and Inequality 1
- Co-authors
- Thomas Buser (5 shared papers)Stefan C. Wolter (4 shared papers)Petter Lundborg (3 shared papers)Dinand Webbink (2 shared papers)Lorenzo Borghi (1 shared paper)Marcel Egli (1 shared paper)P. W. Arnold (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Experimental Economics (2 papers)npj Microgravity (1 paper)Labour Economics (1 paper)American Economic Review (1 paper)Econstor (Econstor) (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsSwitzerlandGermany
In The Last Decade
Noemi Peter
9 papers receiving 211 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
- General Decision Sciences 31
- Safety Research 76
- Gender Studies 51
- Demography 28
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 25
Countries citing papers authored by Noemi Peter
This map shows the geographic impact of Noemi Peter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Noemi Peter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Noemi Peter more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Noemi Peter
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Noemi Peter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Noemi Peter. The network helps show where Noemi Peter may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 7 scholars most cited alongside Noemi Peter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 94 | |
| 2 | 2012 | 55 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 16 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 14 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 12 | |
| 6 | Gender, Willingness to Compete and Career Choices Along the Whole Ability Distribution | 2017 | 9 |
| 7 | 2022 | 9 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 2 | |
| 9 | 2015 | 1 |
About Noemi Peter
Noemi Peter is a scholar working on Safety Research, Gender Studies, Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 9 papers that have together received 212 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (5 papers), Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies (3 papers), Labor market dynamics and wage inequality (3 papers), Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (2 papers), Plant Molecular Biology Research (1 paper), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (1 paper), Plant Parasitism and Resistance (1 paper) and Gender Diversity and Inequality (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (31 citations), Safety Research (76 citations), Gender Studies (51 citations), Demography (28 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (25 citations). Noemi Peter has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Switzerland and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Thomas Buser, Stefan C. Wolter, Petter Lundborg, Dinand Webbink, Lorenzo Borghi, Marcel Egli and P. W. Arnold. Their work appears in journals such as Experimental Economics, npj Microgravity, Labour Economics, American Economic Review and Econstor (Econstor).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.