Rüdiger Thul

30 papers receiving 495 citations

Peers

Rüdiger Thul
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 234
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 108
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 117
  • Sensory Systems 26
  • Physiology 21
Replace J. M. Wagner with:
J. M. Wagner United States
Yulia Timofeeva United Kingdom
Michael Nivala United States
Vladimir E. Bondarenko United States
A. A. Verveen Netherlands
Anushka Michailova United States
Daisuke Sato United States
J. W. Stucki Switzerland
Elizabeth J. Akin United States
Anne K. Green United Kingdom
Rüdiger Thul relative to J. M. Wagner United States J. M. Wagner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.4×
J. M. Wagner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Rüdiger Thul

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rüdiger Thul's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rüdiger Thul with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rüdiger Thul more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rüdiger Thul

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rüdiger Thul. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rüdiger Thul. The network helps show where Rüdiger Thul may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Rüdiger Thul, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Rüdiger Thul Line = papers co-authored together Rüdiger Thul links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010123
2 201179
3 201161
4 201245
5 201825
6 201623
7 201817
8 201613
9 201913
10 201411
11 201411
12 201111
13 201510
14 20179
15 20178
16 20188
17 20197
18 20216
19 20125
20 20205

About Rüdiger Thul

Rüdiger Thul is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 32 papers that have together received 510 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ion channel regulation and function (11 papers), stochastic dynamics and bifurcation (10 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (9 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (8 papers), Nonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation (7 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (7 papers), Gene Regulatory Network Analysis (7 papers) and Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (234 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (108 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (117 citations), Sensory Systems (26 citations) and Physiology (21 citations). Rüdiger Thul has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Stephen Coombes, Martin D. Bootman, H. Llewelyn Roderick, Martin Falcke, Alexander Skupin, Ioannis Smyrnias, Kevin Thurley, Elizabeth M. Cherry, Flavio H. Fenton and Gunnar Seemann. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Theoretical Biology, Cold Spring Harbor Protocols, Physical review. E, European Journal of Applied Mathematics and Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact