Ruby Lipson‐Smith

27 papers receiving 400 citations

Peers

Ruby Lipson‐Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Rehabilitation 43
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 58
  • General Health Professions 82
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 3
  • Occupational Therapy 10
Replace Birgit Wallmann-Sperlich with:
Birgit Wallmann-Sperlich Germany
Aaron Davis Australia
Fei Qin China
Antonio Castillo-Paredes Chile
Toni Dwan Australia
Erica Twardzik United States
Maya Kylén Sweden
Kylie A. Dankiw Australia
Terri L. Davis United States
Melissa Kealey United States
Ruby Lipson‐Smith relative to Birgit Wallmann-Sperlich Germany Birgit Wallmann-Sperlich's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.3×
Birgit Wallmann-Sperlich · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ruby Lipson‐Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ruby Lipson‐Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruby Lipson‐Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruby Lipson‐Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ruby Lipson‐Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruby Lipson‐Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruby Lipson‐Smith. The network helps show where Ruby Lipson‐Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ruby Lipson‐Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ruby Lipson‐Smith Line = papers co-authored together Ruby Lipson‐Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201747
2 202141
3 201831
4 202127
5 201925
6 201825
7 201824
8 201823
9 202022
10 201617
11 201916
12 202414
13 202113
14 201712
15 202211
16 202311
17 20209
18 20238
19 20247
20 20225

About Ruby Lipson‐Smith

Ruby Lipson‐Smith is a scholar working on Rehabilitation, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, General Health Professions, Speech and Hearing and Management of Technology and Innovation, having authored 30 papers that have together received 403 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Urban Green Space and Health (4 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (3 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (2 papers), Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare (2 papers), Color perception and design (2 papers), Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development (2 papers), Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (2 papers) and Health Literacy and Information Accessibility (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (43 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (58 citations), General Health Professions (82 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (3 citations) and Occupational Therapy (10 citations). Ruby Lipson‐Smith has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Sweden and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Julie A Bernhardt, Heidi Zeeman, Amelia Hyatt, Leonid P. Churilov, Marie Elf, Marcus R. White, Michelle Shannon, Michael Jefford, Phyllis Noemi Butow and Penelope E. Schofield. Their work appears in journals such as Health Expectations, Stroke, Psycho-Oncology, Buildings and BMJ Open.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact