Ming Sze

686 citations
16 papers · 532 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Ming Sze

16 papers receiving 516 citations

Peers

Ming Sze
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • General Health Professions 357
  • Clinical Psychology 163
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 208
  • Oncology 137
  • Sociology and Political Science 202
Replace Kent Woo with:
Kent Woo United States
Diane Trusson United Kingdom
Mary Anne Foo United States
Delight E. Satter United States
Janice Linton Canada
Angela M. Jo United States
Soo H. Kang United States
Tara C. Horrill Canada
Shannon C. Wilson United States
Sarah Esmond United States
Ming Sze relative to Kent Woo United States Kent Woo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.5×
Kent Woo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ming Sze

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ming Sze's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ming Sze with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ming Sze more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ming Sze

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ming Sze. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ming Sze. The network helps show where Ming Sze may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ming Sze, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ming Sze Line = papers co-authored together Ming Sze links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 201079
2 201077
3 201168
4 201154
5 201353
6 201551
7 201742
8 201333
9 201528
10 201318
11 201116
12 20125
13
Abstract B32: Unmet needs in Chinese, Greek, and Arabic speaking cancer patients in Australia
20094
14 20202
15 20121
16 20121

About Ming Sze

Ming Sze is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Oncology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 532 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (8 papers), Migration, Health and Trauma (7 papers), Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare (5 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (5 papers), Cultural Competency in Health Care (4 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (3 papers), Family Support in Illness (3 papers) and Ethics in Clinical Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (357 citations), Clinical Psychology (163 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (208 citations), Oncology (137 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (202 citations). Ming Sze has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Phyllis Butow, David Goldstein, Maurice Eisenbruch, Michael Jefford, Lynley Aldridge, Penelope Schofield, Madeleine King, Melanie L. Bell, Afaf Girgis and Skye Dong. Their work appears in journals such as Supportive Care in Cancer, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Patient Education and Counseling, Health Expectations and European Journal of Cancer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact