Rose Sisk

16 papers receiving 303 citations

Peers

Rose Sisk
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Health Informatics 14
  • Health 65
  • Nephrology 33
  • Statistics and Probability 26
  • Health Information Management 14
Replace T. Katrien J. Groenhof with:
T. Katrien J. Groenhof Netherlands
José Benuzillo United States
Inês B. Henriques United Kingdom
Lynda Ayiku United Kingdom
LeighAnne Olsen
Sarah Ronaldson United Kingdom
Sharmala Thuraisingam Australia
Amarnath Annapureddy United States
Roland Brian Büchter Germany
Jin-Ah Sim South Korea
Rose Sisk relative to T. Katrien J. Groenhof Netherlands T. Katrien J. Groenhof's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.5×
T. Katrien J. Groenhof · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Rose Sisk

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rose Sisk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rose Sisk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rose Sisk more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rose Sisk

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rose Sisk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rose Sisk. The network helps show where Rose Sisk may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Rose Sisk, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Rose Sisk Line = papers co-authored together Rose Sisk links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 201868
2 202066
3 202333
4 202030
5 202023
6 202021
7 201718
8 201816
9 201611
10 20187
11 20235
12 20195
13 20223
14 20191
15 20191
16 20221
17 20240
18 20240

About Rose Sisk

Rose Sisk is a scholar working on Nephrology, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, General Health Professions and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 18 papers that have together received 309 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes (6 papers), Diabetes Treatment and Management (4 papers), Machine Learning in Healthcare (3 papers), Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference (2 papers), Intimate Partner and Family Violence (2 papers), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (2 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (2 papers) and Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (14 citations), Health (65 citations), Nephrology (33 citations), Statistics and Probability (26 citations) and Health Information Management (14 citations). Rose Sisk has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, New Zealand and United States. Frequent co-authors include Glen P. Martin, Niels Peek, Matthew Sperrin, Alain C. Vandal, Denise Wilson, Jane Koziol‐McLain, Shyamala Nada‐Raja, Karen Eden, Nancy Glass and Maarten van Smeden. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Medical Internet Research, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, Ear and Hearing and Journal of Affective Disorders.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact