Ronald Polansky
Impact in
- Philosophy top 1%
- Classical Philosophy and Thought
- Medieval and Classical Philosophy
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
- Anthropology top 5%
- Classical Antiquity Studies
Papers in
- Philosophy 16
- Classical Philosophy and Thought 15
- Medieval and Classical Philosophy 3
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory 2
-
- Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies 8
Ronald Polansky
25 papers receiving 191 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
- Philosophy 218
- Anthropology 83
- Archeology 86
- History and Philosophy of Science 30
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 23
Countries citing papers authored by Ronald Polansky
This map shows the geographic impact of Ronald Polansky's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ronald Polansky with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ronald Polansky more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ronald Polansky
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ronald Polansky. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ronald Polansky. The network helps show where Ronald Polansky may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 2 scholars most cited alongside Ronald Polansky, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2007 | 115 | |
| 2 | 2010 | 45 | |
| 3 | 2003 | 25 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 21 | |
| 5 | The dominance of Polis for Aristotle | 1979 | 15 |
| 6 | 2000 | 10 | |
| 7 | Aristotle's De Anima: A Critical Commentary | 2009 | 10 |
| 8 | 1990 | 8 | |
| 9 | Professor Vlastos's analysis of Socratic elenchus' | 1985 | 7 |
| 10 | 2017 | 5 | |
| 11 | 2012 | 4 | |
| 12 | 2002 | 4 | |
| 13 | 1983 | 3 | |
| 14 | 1983 | 3 | |
| 15 | 2014 | 3 | |
| 16 | 2015 | 3 | |
| 17 | 2011 | 2 | |
| 18 | 1999 | 2 | |
| 19 | The unity of Plato's Crito | 1997 | 1 |
| 20 | 2014 | 1 |
About Ronald Polansky
Ronald Polansky is a scholar working on Philosophy, Archeology, Anthropology, General Health Professions and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 29 papers that have together received 294 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Philosophy and Thought (15 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (8 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (4 papers), Medieval and Classical Philosophy (3 papers), Ethics in medical practice (3 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (2 papers), Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life (1 paper) and Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (218 citations), Anthropology (83 citations), Archeology (86 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (30 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (23 citations). Ronald Polansky has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include David Sedley and Mark G. Kuczewski. Their work appears in journals such as Oxford studies in ancient philosophy, Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium of Ancient Philosophy, Ancient Philosophy, The Southern Journal of Philosophy and Pacific philosophical quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.