David Glidden

553 citations
22 papers · 324 · h-index 7

Impact in

  • Philosophy top 1%
    • Classical Philosophy and Thought
    • Philosophical Ethics and Theory
    • Study and Philosophy of Religion
  • Anthropology top 10%
    • Classical Antiquity Studies

Papers in

    • Classical Philosophy and Thought 17
    • Augustinian Studies and Theology 3
    • Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art 1
    • Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 1
    • Diverse Philosophical and Cultural Studies 1

David Glidden

17 papers receiving 198 citations

Peers

David Glidden
Comparison fields: 5 of 30
  • Philosophy 269
  • Anthropology 24
  • Theoretical Computer Science 3
  • General Arts and Humanities 2
  • Classics 5
Replace Eduard Zeller with:
Eduard Zeller
Catherine Osborne United Kingdom
John Glucker Israel
Phillip Mitsis United States
Marek Winiarczyk
Rosamond Kent Sprague United States
Giovanni Reale Italy
Gerard Watson Ireland
Trevor J. Saunders United Kingdom
Michael Erler Germany
David Glidden relative to Eduard Zeller Eduard Zeller's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.5×
Eduard Zeller · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Glidden

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Glidden's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Glidden with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Glidden more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Glidden

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Glidden. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Glidden. The network helps show where David Glidden may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside David Glidden, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Glidden Line = papers co-authored together David Glidden links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1993100
2 198946
3 199342
4
Epicurean Prolepsis
198241
5 198130
6 198324
7 199523
8 19794
9 19753
10 19802
11 19882
12 19912
13 19841
14 19901
15 19981
16 19991
17 20021
18 19810
19 19970
20 19980

About David Glidden

David Glidden is a scholar working on Philosophy, Religious studies, History and Philosophy of Science, History and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 22 papers that have together received 324 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Philosophy and Thought (17 papers), Augustinian Studies and Theology (3 papers), Historical Philosophy and Science (1 paper), Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art (1 paper), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (1 paper), Renaissance and Early Modern Studies (1 paper), Semiotics and Representation Studies (1 paper) and Diverse Philosophical and Cultural Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (269 citations), Anthropology (24 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (3 citations), General Arts and Humanities (2 citations) and Classics (5 citations). David Glidden has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include John J. Cleary and Thomas L. Pangle. Their work appears in journals such as Ancient Philosophy, Noûs, Phronesis, Religion and Journal of the History of Ideas.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact