Oxford studies in ancient philosophy

4.7k citations
367 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

  • Philosophy top 2%
    • Classical Philosophy and Thought
    • Medieval and Classical Philosophy
    • Philosophical Ethics and Theory
    • Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
    • Classical Antiquity Studies

Papers in

    • Classical Philosophy and Thought 303
    • Medieval and Classical Philosophy 92
    • Philosophical Ethics and Theory 33
    • Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought 14
    • Classical Antiquity Studies 80

Oxford studies in ancient philosophy

294 papers receiving 3.0k citations

Peers

Oxford studies in ancient philosophy
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Philosophy 4.0k
  • Anthropology 2.3k
  • Archeology 1.7k
  • History and Philosophy of Science 470
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 306
Replace Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium of Ancient Philosophy with:
Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium of Ancient Philosophy United States
Vivarium United States
Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung United States
Early Science and Medicine United States
History of Philosophy Quarterly United States
Franciscan studies France
Symbolae Osloenses Norway
Classical Antiquity United States
Arethusa United States
Augustinian Studies United States
Oxford studies in ancient philosophy relative to Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium of Ancient Philosophy United States Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium of Ancient Philosophy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.1×
Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium of Ancient Philosophy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Oxford studies in ancient philosophy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Oxford studies in ancient philosophy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Oxford studies in ancient philosophy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Oxford studies in ancient philosophy more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Oxford studies in ancient philosophy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Oxford studies in ancient philosophy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Oxford studies in ancient philosophy.

About Oxford studies in ancient philosophy

The 367 papers published in Oxford studies in ancient philosophy in the last decades have received a total of 4.7k indexed citations . Papers published in Oxford studies in ancient philosophy usually cover Philosophy (315 papers), Anthropology (84 papers), Archeology (86 papers), History and Philosophy of Science (35 papers) and Theoretical Computer Science (1 paper) specifically the topics of Classical Philosophy and Thought (303 papers), Medieval and Classical Philosophy (92 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (81 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (80 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (33 papers), Historical Philosophy and Science (26 papers), Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought (14 papers) and Ethics in medical practice (13 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Oxford studies in ancient philosophy are Martha C. Nussbaum, Stephen Menn, Alexander Nehamas, Richard Bett, Jessica Moss, Charles H. Kahn, Michael Frede, Gail Fine, Howard J. Curzer and Hendrik Lorenz.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact