Ronald Hingley
Impact in
- Philosophy top 10%
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory
Papers in
-
- Russian Literature and Bakhtin Studies 9
-
- Eastern European Communism and Reforms 8
Ronald Hingley
20 papers receiving 127 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
- General Psychology 4
- Philosophy 31
- Cultural Studies 17
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 10
- Political Science and International Relations 49
Countries citing papers authored by Ronald Hingley
This map shows the geographic impact of Ronald Hingley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ronald Hingley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ronald Hingley more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ronald Hingley
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ronald Hingley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ronald Hingley. The network helps show where Ronald Hingley may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 12 scholars most cited alongside Ronald Hingley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1963 | 73 | |
| 2 | 1978 | 31 | |
| 3 | The undiscovered Dostoyevsky | 1962 | 10 |
| 4 | 1977 | 7 | |
| 5 | Nihilists : Russian radicals and revolutionaries in the reign of Alexander II (1855-81) | 1969 | 6 |
| 6 | 1972 | 6 | |
| 7 | Russian writers and society, 1825-1904 | 1967 | 6 |
| 8 | 1984 | 6 | |
| 9 | 1980 | 6 | |
| 10 | 1979 | 5 | |
| 11 | 1975 | 5 | |
| 12 | 1979 | 5 | |
| 13 | 1984 | 4 | |
| 14 | 1972 | 4 | |
| 15 | Russia : a concise history | 2003 | 3 |
| 16 | 1983 | 2 | |
| 17 | 1983 | 2 | |
| 18 | The Russian master and other stories | 1984 | 2 |
| 19 | Under Soviet skins : an untourist's report | 1961 | 1 |
| 20 | 1973 | 1 |
About Ronald Hingley
Ronald Hingley is a scholar working on Education, Sociology and Political Science, Literature and Literary Theory, Cultural Studies and Philosophy, having authored 39 papers that have together received 193 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Russian Literature and Bakhtin Studies (9 papers), Eastern European Communism and Reforms (8 papers), Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (4 papers), Gothic Literature and Media Analysis (3 papers), Cultural Studies and Interdisciplinary Research (3 papers), Discourse Analysis and Cultural Communication (2 papers), Intelligence, Security, War Strategy (2 papers) and Theatre and Performance Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (4 citations), Philosophy (31 citations), Cultural Studies (17 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (10 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (49 citations). Frequent co-authors include Thomas F. Magner, Alexander Solzhenitsyn, James Cracraft, Tom Lewis, George S. Smith, Антон Павлович Чехов, Peter Doyle, Stephan M. Horak, Sidney Monas and Robert Porter. Their work appears in journals such as The Russian Review, The Slavic and East European Journal, The Modern Language Review, Modern Language Journal and The American Historical Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.