Anna Bostock

1.6k citations
14 papers · 687 · 1 hit paper · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Anna Bostock

11 papers receiving 303 citations

Anna Bostock's Hit Papers

The theory of the novel : a historico-philosophical essay on the forms of great epic literature 1971 · 541 citations
5410+18+36Years since publication100200300400500

Peers

Anna Bostock
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Literature and Literary Theory 238
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 67
  • Philosophy 127
  • Anthropology 72
  • History 75
Replace Maire J. Kurrik with:
Maire J. Kurrik
Α. Owen Aldridge United States
Curtis Carroll Davis United States
Jean Alter United States
Denis Hollier
Jay Leyda United States
Hazard Adams United States
Jerome Hamilton Buckley United States
Jonathan Mayne
Vytautas Kavolis United States
Anna Bostock relative to Maire J. Kurrik Maire J. Kurrik's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Maire J. Kurrik · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Bostock

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Bostock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Bostock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Bostock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Bostock

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Bostock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Bostock. The network helps show where Anna Bostock may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Anna Bostock, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Bostock Line = papers co-authored together Anna Bostock links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1
The theory of the novel : a historico-philosophical essay on the forms of great epic literature
Hit paper breakdown →
1971541
2
The Necessity of Art: A Marxist Approach
197053
3 197550
4
How to Read Karl Marx
199614
5
Marx in his own words
197010
6
Modulor I and II
19806
7 19633
8 19783
9
Modulor 2, 1955 : (let the user speak next)
19582
10 19712
11 19732
12
The essential Marx
19701
13 19630
14 19570

About Anna Bostock

Anna Bostock is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Infectious Diseases, Organic Chemistry, Surgery and Communication, having authored 14 papers that have together received 687 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Critical Theory and Philosophy (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (238 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (67 citations), Philosophy (127 citations), Anthropology (72 citations) and History (75 citations). Anna Bostock has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include György Lukács, Ernst Fischer, Georg Lukács, Stephen Zelnick, John Bellamy Foster, Le Corbusier, P. C. Thomas, Aimé Césaire, John Berger and Ronald Hingley. Their work appears in journals such as NOVEL A Forum on Fiction, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, The Russian Review, African Arts and The Hudson Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact