Ronald Donelson

31 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Ronald Donelson
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Pharmacology 930
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 706
  • Medical Laboratory Technology 20
  • Cell Biology 213
  • Surgery 420
Replace Astrid Friis with:
Astrid Friis Norway
Ken Niere Australia
Jon J. Ford Australia
Michael T. Cibulka United States
Robert E. Boyles United States
Helen Clare Australia
Cristin Jouve United States
Carol Hartigan United States
George Α. Koumantakis Greece
Isabelle Pagé Canada
Ronald Donelson relative to Astrid Friis Norway Astrid Friis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Astrid Friis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ronald Donelson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ronald Donelson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ronald Donelson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ronald Donelson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ronald Donelson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ronald Donelson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ronald Donelson. The network helps show where Ronald Donelson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ronald Donelson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ronald Donelson Line = papers co-authored together Ronald Donelson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997189
2 1999144
3
Centralization phenomenon. Its usefulness in evaluating and treating referred pain.
1990134
4 1990111
5 199194
6 199782
7 200846
8 199541
9 200340
10 201940
11 199539
12 201227
13 200322
14 202018
15
The McKenzie approach to evaluating and treating low back pain.
199018
16 199917
17 201912
18
Rapidly Reversible Low Back Pain
200612
19 199511
20 20117

About Ronald Donelson

Ronald Donelson is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Surgery, Cell Biology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 34 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (25 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (24 papers), Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment (5 papers), Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (3 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (3 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers), Pregnancy-related medical research (2 papers) and Medical Practices and Rehabilitation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (930 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (706 citations), Medical Laboratory Technology (20 citations), Cell Biology (213 citations) and Surgery (420 citations). Ronald Donelson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Kenneth D. Murphy, William D. Grant, Robert L. Medcalf, Charles N. Aprill, Gustavo Silva, Nathaniel R. Ordway, Leonard Hojnowski, W. Thomas Edwards, Stephen May and F. Todd Wetzel. Their work appears in journals such as Spine, The Spine Journal, PM&R, Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine and Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact