Robin D. Post

570 citations
26 papers · 490 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Robin D. Post

24 papers receiving 436 citations

Peers

Robin D. Post
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Applied Psychology 94
  • Health 80
  • Clinical Psychology 209
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 124
  • General Decision Sciences 11
Replace Gloria K. Litman with:
Gloria K. Litman United Kingdom
William M. Bumberry United States
Kenneth D. Allred United States
Michael Gräf Germany
Ernest Edward Beckham United States
Robert A. deMayo United States
Irwin L. Kutash United States
Arlene Mayol
Terry Marks United States
Christopher Holmes United States
Robin D. Post relative to Gloria K. Litman United Kingdom Gloria K. Litman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Gloria K. Litman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robin D. Post

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robin D. Post's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robin D. Post with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robin D. Post more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robin D. Post

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robin D. Post. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robin D. Post. The network helps show where Robin D. Post may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Robin D. Post, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robin D. Post Line = papers co-authored together Robin D. Post links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197579
2 197265
3 198057
4 197955
5 197950
6 198231
7 198025
8 198321
9 197414
10 198112
11 198011
12 198510
13 19849
14 19829
15 19747
16 19867
17 20116
18 19795
19 19804
20 19854

About Robin D. Post

Robin D. Post is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Applied Psychology and General Health Professions, having authored 26 papers that have together received 490 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (3 papers), Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse (2 papers), Psychological Testing and Assessment (2 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (2 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (2 papers), Sex work and related issues (1 paper) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (94 citations), Health (80 citations), Clinical Psychology (209 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (124 citations) and General Decision Sciences (11 citations). Robin D. Post has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Walter C. Lobitz, Richard C. Erickson, Albert S. Carlin, Cornelis B. Bakker, Lawrence M. Halpern, Ronald D. Franks, Michael Weissberg, James R. Clopton, Neil J. Baker and Anna M. Jackson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality Assessment, Journal of Abnormal Psychology, Journal of Clinical Psychology, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology and Sex Roles.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact