Robert Walcott
Impact in
- History top 2%
- Scottish History and National Identity
- Reformation and Early Modern Christianity
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- Historical Economic and Social Studies
Papers in
- History 7
- Scottish History and National Identity 5
- European Political History Analysis 2
-
- American Constitutional Law and Politics 3
- Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East 2
- Co-authors
- Charles Wilson (1 shared paper)G. E. Mingay (1 shared paper)Robert Halsband (1 shared paper)Francis James (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The American Historical Review (8 papers)The William and Mary Quarterly (3 papers)Journal of British Studies (2 papers)The Journal of Modern History (1 paper)The English Historical Review (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Robert Walcott
13 papers receiving 170 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
- History 92
- Economics and Econometrics 149
- Political Science and International Relations 99
- Anthropology 36
- Museology 8
Countries citing papers authored by Robert Walcott
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Walcott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Walcott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Walcott more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Walcott
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Walcott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Walcott. The network helps show where Robert Walcott may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 4 scholars most cited alongside Robert Walcott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1966 | 87 | |
| 2 | 1964 | 55 | |
| 3 | 1956 | 32 | |
| 4 | 1973 | 30 | |
| 5 | 1966 | 29 | |
| 6 | 1964 | 20 | |
| 7 | 1956 | 7 | |
| 8 | 1959 | 4 | |
| 9 | 1957 | 4 | |
| 10 | 1962 | 3 | |
| 11 | 1975 | 3 | |
| 12 | 1957 | 3 | |
| 13 | 1962 | 2 | |
| 14 | 1962 | 2 | |
| 15 | The tudor-stuart period of english history (1485-1714) : a review of changing interpretations | 1964 | 1 |
| 16 | 1962 | 1 | |
| 17 | 1959 | 1 |
About Robert Walcott
Robert Walcott is a scholar working on History, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 17 papers that have together received 284 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Scottish History and National Identity (5 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (4 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (3 papers), European Political History Analysis (2 papers), Irish and British Studies (2 papers), Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East (2 papers), Australian History and Society (2 papers) and Philippine History and Culture (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History (92 citations), Economics and Econometrics (149 citations), Political Science and International Relations (99 citations), Anthropology (36 citations) and Museology (8 citations). Robert Walcott has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Charles Wilson, G. E. Mingay, Robert Halsband and Francis James. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, The William and Mary Quarterly, Journal of British Studies, The Journal of Modern History and The English Historical Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.