Robert Walcott
Impact in
- History top 2%
- Historical Studies of British Isles
- Reformation and Early Modern Christianity
- Philosophy, History, and Historiography
- Libraries, Manuscripts, and Books
- Economics and Econometrics top 10%
- Historical Economic and Social Studies
Papers in
- History 17
- Historical Studies of British Isles 11
- Philosophy, History, and Historiography 5
- Biographical and Historical Analysis 3
- Medical History and Innovations 1
-
- Political and Economic history of UK and US 8
- Co-authors
- Charles Wilson (1 shared paper)G. E. Mingay (1 shared paper)Robert Halsband (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The American Historical Review (8 papers)The William and Mary Quarterly (3 papers)Journal of British Studies (2 papers)The English Historical Review (1 paper)The Journal of Modern History (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Robert Walcott
13 papers receiving 154 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
- History 102
- Economics and Econometrics 82
- Political Science and International Relations 90
- Philosophy 43
- Classics 9
Countries citing papers authored by Robert Walcott
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Walcott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Walcott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Walcott more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Walcott
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Walcott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Walcott. The network helps show where Robert Walcott may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 3 scholars most cited alongside Robert Walcott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1966 | 81 | |
| 2 | 1964 | 52 | |
| 3 | 1956 | 30 | |
| 4 | 1973 | 30 | |
| 5 | 1966 | 27 | |
| 6 | 1964 | 19 | |
| 7 | 1956 | 7 | |
| 8 | 1959 | 4 | |
| 9 | 1957 | 3 | |
| 10 | 1962 | 3 | |
| 11 | 1975 | 3 | |
| 12 | 1957 | 2 | |
| 13 | 1962 | 2 | |
| 14 | 1962 | 2 | |
| 15 | 1959 | 1 | |
| 16 | 1962 | 1 | |
| 17 | The tudor-stuart period of english history (1485-1714) : a review of changing interpretations | 1964 | 1 |
About Robert Walcott
Robert Walcott is a scholar working on History, Political Science and International Relations, Classics, Literature and Literary Theory and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 17 papers that have together received 268 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Studies of British Isles (11 papers), Political and Economic history of UK and US (8 papers), Philosophy, History, and Historiography (5 papers), Biographical and Historical Analysis (3 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (3 papers), Autobiographical and Biographical Writing (2 papers), Medical History and Innovations (1 paper) and Medieval Literature and History (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History (102 citations), Economics and Econometrics (82 citations), Political Science and International Relations (90 citations), Philosophy (43 citations) and Classics (9 citations). Robert Walcott has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Charles Wilson, G. E. Mingay and Robert Halsband. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, The William and Mary Quarterly, Journal of British Studies, The English Historical Review and The Journal of Modern History.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.