Robert W. Fraser

28 papers receiving 577 citations

Peers

Robert W. Fraser
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Genetics 163
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 404
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 56
  • Oncology 128
  • Epidemiology 86
Replace David H. Harrington with:
David H. Harrington United States
R. K. Agrawal United Kingdom
Tetsuji Kurokawa Japan
Shih–Yuan Lee United States
Shigeru Ishikawa Japan
Nathan Smith United States
Minting Ye China
María Teresa Vargas Spain
Mike G. Martin United States
Lubaba Khan Bangladesh
Robert W. Fraser relative to David H. Harrington United States David H. Harrington's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13.0×
David H. Harrington · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert W. Fraser

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert W. Fraser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert W. Fraser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert W. Fraser more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert W. Fraser

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert W. Fraser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert W. Fraser. The network helps show where Robert W. Fraser may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert W. Fraser, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert W. Fraser Line = papers co-authored together Robert W. Fraser links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015148
2 2014115
3 200672
4 201667
5 197931
6 200331
7 200123
8 199616
9 200214
10 197812
11 19859
12 19908
13 19838
14 19867
15 20167
16 19926
17 19846
18 19535
19 20035
20 19863

About Robert W. Fraser

Robert W. Fraser is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Genetics and Epidemiology, having authored 30 papers that have together received 606 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Brain Metastases and Treatment (5 papers), Agricultural risk and resilience (4 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (4 papers), Global trade and economics (4 papers), Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets (4 papers), Agricultural Economics and Policy (4 papers), Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (4 papers) and Natural Resources and Economic Development (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (163 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (404 citations), General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (56 citations), Oncology (128 citations) and Epidemiology (86 citations). Robert W. Fraser has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Anthony L. Asher, Stuart H. Burri, H. James Norton, Walter F. Wiggins, Roshan S. Prabhu, Walter J. Curran, Kirtesh R. Patel, Ian Crocker, Margaret O. Boltes and Hui‐Kuo G. Shu. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, Journal of Agricultural Economics, Journal of Clinical Oncology, The American Journal of Surgery and Journal of neurosurgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact