Jack Rock
Impact in
Papers in
- Co-authors
- Mark L. Rosenblum (37 shared papers)Samuel Ryu (29 shared papers)Tom Mikkelsen (22 shared papers)Jae Ho Kim (10 shared papers)Lisa Scarpace (15 shared papers)Ghaus M. Malik (3 shared papers)Rohit K. Khanna (3 shared papers)Rajan Jain (17 shared papers)
- Journals
- Neurosurgery (24 papers)Journal of Neuro-Oncology (13 papers)Journal of neurosurgery (10 papers)World Neurosurgery (8 papers)Neurosurgical FOCUS (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomPakistan
In The Last Decade
Jack Rock
119 papers receiving 4.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
- Genetics 1.0k
- Surgery 1.8k
- Radiation 337
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 805
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 486
Countries citing papers authored by Jack Rock
This map shows the geographic impact of Jack Rock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jack Rock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jack Rock more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jack Rock
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jack Rock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jack Rock. The network helps show where Jack Rock may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jack Rock, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 129 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2003 | 272 | |
| 2 | 2006 | 216 | |
| 3 | 1996 | 186 | |
| 4 | 2002 | 180 | |
| 5 | 1998 | 177 | |
| 6 | 2004 | 170 | |
| 7 | 2009 | 161 | |
| 8 | 2004 | 157 | |
| 9 | 2001 | 150 | |
| 10 | 2008 | 121 | |
| 11 | 2008 | 117 | |
| 12 | 1995 | 109 | |
| 13 | 2010 | 109 | |
| 14 | 2007 | 96 | |
| 15 | 2006 | 94 | |
| 16 | 2002 | 93 | |
| 17 | 2006 | 89 | |
| 18 | 1996 | 73 | |
| 19 | 2012 | 70 | |
| 20 | 1999 | 60 |
About Jack Rock
Jack Rock is a scholar working on Surgery, Genetics, Epidemiology, Neurology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 129 papers that have together received 4.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (25 papers), Management of metastatic bone disease (24 papers), Meningioma and schwannoma management (21 papers), Head and Neck Surgical Oncology (15 papers), Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments (11 papers), Brain Metastases and Treatment (10 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (10 papers) and Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (1.0k citations), Surgery (1.8k citations), Radiation (337 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (805 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (486 citations). Jack Rock has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Pakistan. Frequent co-authors include Mark L. Rosenblum, Samuel Ryu, Tom Mikkelsen, Jae Ho Kim, Lisa Scarpace, Ghaus M. Malik, Rohit K. Khanna, Rajan Jain, Benjamin Movsas and David Hearshen. Their work appears in journals such as Neurosurgery, Journal of Neuro-Oncology, Journal of neurosurgery, World Neurosurgery and Neurosurgical FOCUS.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.