Robert Vining

65 papers receiving 759 citations

Peers

Robert Vining
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Pharmacology 350
  • Occupational Therapy 27
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 89
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 99
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 37
Replace Joel M. Stevans with:
Joel M. Stevans United States
Alessandra N. Garcia United States
Eric K. Robertson United States
Angela Searle Australia
Eduardo B. Cruz Portugal
Carolina Valencia United States
Brent Leininger United States
Laurie Devaney United States
Kjartan Vibe Fersum Norway
Jacqueline H. Gracey United Kingdom
Robert Vining relative to Joel M. Stevans United States Joel M. Stevans's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Joel M. Stevans · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Vining

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Vining's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Vining with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Vining more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Vining

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Vining. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Vining. The network helps show where Robert Vining may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert Vining, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert Vining Line = papers co-authored together Robert Vining links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 73 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201860
2 201257
3 201951
4 201739
5 201531
6 201730
7 201730
8 201328
9 202025
10 201823
11 201123
12 201922
13 201622
14 201418
15 201817
16 201517
17
An evidence-based diagnostic classification system for low back pain.
201317
18 201316
19 201715
20 201914

About Robert Vining

Robert Vining is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Surgery, General Health Professions and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 73 papers that have together received 794 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (35 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (4 papers), Clinical practice guidelines implementation (4 papers), Pain Management and Opioid Use (3 papers), Migraine and Headache Studies (3 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (3 papers), Shoulder Injury and Treatment (3 papers) and Ethics in Clinical Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (350 citations), Occupational Therapy (27 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (89 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (99 citations) and Complementary and alternative medicine (37 citations). Robert Vining has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Cynthia R. Long, Christine Goertz, Katherine A. Pohlman, Stacie A. Salsbury, Amy L. Minkalis, Maruti R. Gudavalli, Ian D. Coulter, Joan Walter, Ting Xia and James W. DeVocht. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, Trials, BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, Chiropractic & Manual Therapies and Pain Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact