Robert van Rooy

1.3k citations
20 papers · 547 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Robert van Rooy

18 papers receiving 446 citations

Peers

Robert van Rooy
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
  • Language and Linguistics 306
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 132
  • Artificial Intelligence 269
  • Philosophy 86
  • Linguistics and Language 32
Replace Stephanie Solt with:
Stephanie Solt Germany
Alice Ter Meulen Netherlands
Galit W. Sassoon Netherlands
Anton Benz Germany
Judith Degen United States
Daniel Lassiter United States
Maria Aloni Netherlands
Godehard Link Germany
Cleo Condoravdi United States
Alice Davison United States
Robert van Rooy relative to Stephanie Solt Germany Stephanie Solt's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Stephanie Solt · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert van Rooy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert van Rooy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert van Rooy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert van Rooy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert van Rooy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert van Rooy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert van Rooy. The network helps show where Robert van Rooy may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 3 scholars most cited alongside Robert van Rooy, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert van Rooy Line = papers co-authored together Robert van Rooy links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 2003105
2 200392
3 200487
4 200058
5 200341
6 200332
7 200327
8 200025
9 200417
10 200113
11 200413
12 20019
13 20048
14 20016
15 20025
16
Pragmatics for propositional attitudes
20014
17 20033
18 20031
19 20031
20 20150

About Robert van Rooy

Robert van Rooy is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Language and Linguistics, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Philosophy and Safety Research, having authored 20 papers that have together received 547 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (8 papers), Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation (7 papers), Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (4 papers), Advanced Algebra and Logic (4 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (3 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (2 papers), Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (2 papers) and Language and cultural evolution (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Language and Linguistics (306 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (132 citations), Artificial Intelligence (269 citations), Philosophy (86 citations) and Linguistics and Language (32 citations). Robert van Rooy has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include P. Dekker, Maria Aloni and Martin Stokhof. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Semantics, Linguistics and Philosophy, Journal of Logic Language and Information, Synthese and Journal of Philosophical Logic.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact