Daniel Lassiter

1.4k citations
39 papers · 750 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Lassiter

37 papers receiving 682 citations

Peers

Daniel Lassiter
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Language and Linguistics 297
  • General Decision Sciences 43
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 251
  • Philosophy 221
  • Artificial Intelligence 340
Replace Isabel Orenes with:
Isabel Orenes Spain
Daniel Rothschild United Kingdom
Galit W. Sassoon Netherlands
Diana Raffman United States
Stephanie Solt Germany
Maria Aloni Netherlands
Ariel Cohen Israel
Seth Yalcin United States
Anthony S. Gillies United States
Barbara Abbott United States
Daniel Lassiter relative to Isabel Orenes Spain Isabel Orenes's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.7×
Isabel Orenes · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Lassiter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Lassiter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Lassiter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Lassiter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Lassiter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Lassiter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Lassiter. The network helps show where Daniel Lassiter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Lassiter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Lassiter Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Lassiter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015113
2 2013109
3 201075
4 201575
5 201175
6 201756
7 201643
8 201430
9 201224
10 200821
11 202219
12 201912
13 20159
14 20179
15 20119
16 20238
17
A rational speech-act model of projective content.
20167
18 20216
19 20125
20 20165

About Daniel Lassiter

Daniel Lassiter is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Language and Linguistics, Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 39 papers that have together received 750 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (16 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (12 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (10 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (9 papers), Advanced Algebra and Logic (6 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (5 papers), Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (4 papers) and Language and cultural evolution (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Language and Linguistics (297 citations), General Decision Sciences (43 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (251 citations), Philosophy (221 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (340 citations). Daniel Lassiter has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and France. Frequent co-authors include Noah D. Goodman, Christopher Potts, Michael C. Frank, Roger Lévy, Jean Baratgin, Judith Degen and Michael Franke. Their work appears in journals such as Cognitive Science, Mind & Language, Inquiry, Synthese and Frontiers in Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact