Robert Van Pelt

1.3k citations
30 papers · 1.1k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Robert Van Pelt

27 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Robert Van Pelt
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 568
  • Global and Planetary Change 502
  • Insect Science 196
  • Soil Science 133
  • Ecology 316
Replace Don C. Bragg with:
Don C. Bragg United States
Vílém Podrázský Czechia
Tanja Sanders Germany
Miguel Montoro Girona Canada
David D. Reed United States
Kalev Jõgiste Estonia
Albert Reif Germany
Rongzhou Man Canada
Vincent Badeau France
Markku Larjavaara Finland
Robert Van Pelt relative to Don C. Bragg United States Don C. Bragg's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Don C. Bragg · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Van Pelt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Van Pelt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Van Pelt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Van Pelt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Van Pelt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Van Pelt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Van Pelt. The network helps show where Robert Van Pelt may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert Van Pelt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert Van Pelt Line = papers co-authored together Robert Van Pelt links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000143
2 2006105
3 2015100
4 200996
5 201396
6 200785
7 200869
8
Analyzing canopy structure in Pacific Northwest old-growth forests with a stand-scale crown model
199637
9 201936
10 201833
11 200432
12 201830
13 200025
14 199425
15 201824
16 202023
17 202222
18 201020
19 200419
20 201917

About Robert Van Pelt

Robert Van Pelt is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change, Atmospheric Science, Insect Science and Environmental Engineering, having authored 30 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forest ecology and management (19 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (9 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (6 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (6 papers), Tree-ring climate responses (5 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (5 papers), Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications (4 papers) and Tree Root and Stability Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (568 citations), Global and Planetary Change (502 citations), Insect Science (196 citations), Soil Science (133 citations) and Ecology (316 citations). Robert Van Pelt has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Romania and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Stephen C. Sillett, Jerry F. Franklin, Robert J. Naiman, Allyson L. Carroll, Russell D. Kramer, Thomas C. O’Keefe, Malcolm P. North, J. Scott Bechtold, J. J. Latterell and Timothy J. Beechie. Their work appears in journals such as Forest Ecology and Management, Ecological Monographs, Canadian Journal of Forest Research, Radiocarbon and The ISME Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact