Robert Stanton

23 papers receiving 240 citations

Peers

Robert Stanton
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Classics 26
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 17
  • Family Practice 5
  • Language and Linguistics 30
  • Education 70
Replace Brian Nelson with:
Brian Nelson Australia
Mark A. Chancey United States
J. Dover Wilson United States
Stephanie Rivale United States
Peter Holbrook United States
Chris Keil United States
Adrián Goldsworthy Australia
George Elliott Howard United States
Robert Stanton relative to Brian Nelson Australia Brian Nelson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×17.5×
Brian Nelson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Stanton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Stanton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Stanton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Stanton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Stanton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Stanton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Stanton. The network helps show where Robert Stanton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Robert Stanton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert Stanton Line = papers co-authored together Robert Stanton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201752
2
Teori fiksi Robert Stanton
200731
3 201728
4 201727
5
Coal bed sequestration of carbon dioxide
200124
6 199423
7
The Culture of Translation in Anglo-Saxon England
200222
8 201614
9 201711
10 20164
11
Could the Pharmaceutical Industry Benefit from Full-Scale Adoption of Radio-Frequency Identification (RFID) Technology with New Regulations?
20164
12 19944
13 20153
14 19962
15 20062
16 20102
17 20022
18 19682
19 20182
20 20131

About Robert Stanton

Robert Stanton is a scholar working on Classics, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Education, Sociology and Political Science and General Health Professions, having authored 29 papers that have together received 265 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medieval Literature and History (6 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (4 papers), Cultural Studies and Interdisciplinary Research (2 papers), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (2 papers), Linguistics and language evolution (2 papers), Problem and Project Based Learning (2 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (2 papers) and American and British Literature Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (26 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (17 citations), Family Practice (5 citations), Language and Linguistics (30 citations) and Education (70 citations). Robert Stanton has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Philippines and Australia. Frequent co-authors include H. Glenn Anderson, Chris Gillette, Michael Rudolph, Nicole Rockich‐Winston, Stephanie L. Anderson, Romeo M. Flores, Gary D. Stricker, Peter D. Warwick, H.J. Gluskoter and Kimberly Broedel-Zaugg. Their work appears in journals such as Bioresource Technology, Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, PMLA/Publications of the Modern Language Association of America and College English.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact