Robert O. Brush
Impact in
-
- Urban Green Space and Health
- Global and Planetary Change top 5%
- Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Papers in
-
- Urban Green Space and Health 5
-
- Land Use and Ecosystem Services 4
- Forest Management and Policy 1
- Co-authors
- Elwood L. Shafer (1 shared paper)Julius Gy. Fábos (1 shared paper)Ervin H. Zube (1 shared paper)Yi‐Fu Tuan (1 shared paper)Richard E. Chenoweth (1 shared paper)James F. Palmer (1 shared paper)Jack Ward Thomas (1 shared paper)Richard M. DeGraaf (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Landscape Research (1 paper)Geographical Review (1 paper)Forest Science (1 paper)Landscape and Urban Planning (1 paper)Urban Ecology (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Robert O. Brush
12 papers receiving 495 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 343
- Global and Planetary Change 299
- Speech and Hearing 37
- Social Psychology 95
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 55
Countries citing papers authored by Robert O. Brush
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert O. Brush's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert O. Brush with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert O. Brush more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert O. Brush
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert O. Brush. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert O. Brush. The network helps show where Robert O. Brush may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 10 scholars most cited alongside Robert O. Brush, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1976 | 220 | |
| 2 | 1977 | 114 | |
| 3 | 2000 | 82 | |
| 4 | 1979 | 61 | |
| 5 | 1976 | 27 | |
| 6 | Measuring the impact of urbanization on scenic quality: land use change in the northeast | 1979 | 21 |
| 7 | 1980 | 20 | |
| 8 | 1978 | 13 | |
| 9 | 1981 | 11 | |
| 10 | 1979 | 9 | |
| 11 | Invite Wildlife to Your Backyard. | 1973 | 4 |
| 12 | Visual impacts in the urban-wildland interface | 1979 | 1 |
About Robert O. Brush
Robert O. Brush is a scholar working on Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Global and Planetary Change, Economics and Econometrics, Speech and Hearing and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, having authored 12 papers that have together received 583 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Economic and Environmental Valuation (5 papers), Urban Green Space and Health (5 papers), Land Use and Ecosystem Services (4 papers), Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management (1 paper), American Environmental and Regional History (1 paper), Forest Management and Policy (1 paper), Noise Effects and Management (1 paper) and Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (343 citations), Global and Planetary Change (299 citations), Speech and Hearing (37 citations), Social Psychology (95 citations) and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (55 citations). Robert O. Brush has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Elwood L. Shafer, Julius Gy. Fábos, Ervin H. Zube, Yi‐Fu Tuan, Richard E. Chenoweth, James F. Palmer, Jack Ward Thomas, Richard M. DeGraaf, Rowan A. Rowntree and Arthur W. Magill. Their work appears in journals such as Landscape Research, Geographical Review, Forest Science, Landscape and Urban Planning and Urban Ecology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.