Robert Nadon

59 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Robert Nadon's Hit Papers

Statistical practice in high-throughput screening data analysis 2006 · 556 citations
5560+6+13Years since publication100200300400500

Peers

Robert Nadon
Comparison fields: 5 of 160
  • General Psychology 106
  • Biophysics 207
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 396
  • Molecular Biology 1.3k
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 247
Replace Mark Reimers with:
Mark Reimers United States
John Hunter United States
John A. Bachman United States
Yoshio Sakurai Japan
Kristian Sandberg Denmark
Anthony Gitter United States
Florian Prinz Germany
Susana R. Neves United States
Paul A. Johnston United States
Uğis Sarkans United Kingdom
Robert Nadon relative to Mark Reimers United States Mark Reimers's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×26.5×
Mark Reimers · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Nadon

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Nadon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Nadon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Nadon more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Nadon

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Nadon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Nadon. The network helps show where Robert Nadon may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert Nadon, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert Nadon Line = papers co-authored together Robert Nadon links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 59 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Statistical practice in high-throughput screening data analysis
Hit paper breakdown →
2006556
2 2008243
3 2002224
4 199183
5 200772
6 199168
7 200666
8 201865
9 200962
10 201058
11 198756
12 201154
13
The measurement of hypnotic ability.
199253
14 200951
15 200346
16 198645
17 198644
18 201443
19 202142
20 200542

About Robert Nadon

Robert Nadon is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Biophysics, Computational Theory and Mathematics and General Psychology, having authored 59 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pain Management and Placebo Effect (15 papers), Cell Image Analysis Techniques (12 papers), Gene expression and cancer classification (10 papers), Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (7 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (7 papers), Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function (7 papers), Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (5 papers) and Mind wandering and attention (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (106 citations), Biophysics (207 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (396 citations), Molecular Biology (1.3k citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (247 citations). Robert Nadon has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Nathalie Malo, Jerry Pelletier, James A. Hanley, Jennifer Shoemaker, Sonia Cerquozzi, Jean-Roch Laurence, Campbell Perry, Vladimir Makarenkov, Ola Larsson and John F. Kihlstrom. Their work appears in journals such as Bioinformatics, International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, SLAS DISCOVERY, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology and BMC Bioinformatics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact