Robert N. Broadus

2.0k citations
27 papers · 1.5k · 1 hit paper · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Robert N. Broadus

25 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Robert N. Broadus's Hit Papers

Toward a definition of “bibliometrics” 1987 · 1.2k citations
1.2k0+13+26Years since publication2505007501000

Peers

Robert N. Broadus
Comparison fields: 5 of 174
  • Library and Information Sciences 54
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 177
  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 24
  • Strategy and Management 229
  • Marketing 119
Replace Angela E. Pritchard with:
Angela E. Pritchard United Kingdom
Michael Norris United Kingdom
Concepción S. Wilson Australia
M. M. Kessler United States
Fredrik Åström Sweden
J Courtial France
Péter Jacsó United States
Satu Alakangas Australia
Sebastian K. Boell Australia
Jesper Wiborg Schneider Denmark
Robert N. Broadus relative to Angela E. Pritchard United Kingdom Angela E. Pritchard's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Angela E. Pritchard · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert N. Broadus

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert N. Broadus's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert N. Broadus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert N. Broadus more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert N. Broadus

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert N. Broadus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert N. Broadus. The network helps show where Robert N. Broadus may publish in the future.

No co-authors to show.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Toward a definition of “bibliometrics”
Hit paper breakdown →
19871186
2 198358
3 198751
4 198528
5 195227
6
Use Studies of Library Collections.
198025
7
Selecting materials for libraries
198123
8
Information needs of humanities scholars: A study of requests made at the national humanities center
198717
9 196410
10 196510
11 19858
12 19777
13 19836
14 19856
15 19896
16
The administration of the government documents collection
19533
17 19903
18 19873
19 19832
20 19852

About Robert N. Broadus

Robert N. Broadus is a scholar working on Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, History and Philosophy of Science, Information Systems, Library and Information Sciences and Education, having authored 27 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (4 papers), scientometrics and bibliometrics research (4 papers), Publishing and Scholarly Communication (3 papers), Library Science and Information Systems (2 papers), Library Science and Administration (2 papers), Library Science and Information Literacy (2 papers), Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation (1 paper) and Surface and Thin Film Phenomena (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Library and Information Sciences (54 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (177 citations), Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (24 citations), Strategy and Management (229 citations) and Marketing (119 citations). Robert N. Broadus has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Their work appears in journals such as College & Research Libraries, Collection Management, Serials Review, Collection Building and Educational and Psychological Measurement.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact