Robert M. Weir
Impact in
- Anthropology top 5%
- Colonialism, slavery, and trade
- Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies
Papers in
-
- American Constitutional Law and Politics 10
-
- Race, History, and American Society 9
- Co-authors
- Daniel C. Littlefield (1 shared paper)Peter H. Wood (1 shared paper)James A. Henretta (1 shared paper)George C. Rogers (1 shared paper)Betty Wood (1 shared paper)John F. Cherry (1 shared paper)James Kirby Martin (1 shared paper)Gordon S. Wood (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The William and Mary Quarterly (8 papers)The Journal of Southern History (7 papers)Labor History (2 papers)Journal of American History (2 papers)The Journal of Interdisciplinary History (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Robert M. Weir
26 papers receiving 132 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
- Anthropology 81
- Archeology 8
- Marketing 42
- Political Science and International Relations 73
- Cultural Studies 21
Countries citing papers authored by Robert M. Weir
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert M. Weir's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert M. Weir with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert M. Weir more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert M. Weir
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert M. Weir. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert M. Weir. The network helps show where Robert M. Weir may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 17 scholars most cited alongside Robert M. Weir, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1984 | 37 | |
| 2 | 1975 | 36 | |
| 3 | 1969 | 31 | |
| 4 | 1974 | 24 | |
| 5 | 1986 | 18 | |
| 6 | 1984 | 13 | |
| 7 | 1969 | 11 | |
| 8 | 2007 | 8 | |
| 9 | 2000 | 7 | |
| 10 | 1971 | 7 | |
| 11 | 1996 | 7 | |
| 12 | 1974 | 6 | |
| 13 | 1999 | 5 | |
| 14 | 1976 | 5 | |
| 15 | 1993 | 4 | |
| 16 | 1984 | 4 | |
| 17 | 1990 | 4 | |
| 18 | 1995 | 3 | |
| 19 | 1994 | 3 | |
| 20 | 1998 | 2 |
About Robert M. Weir
Robert M. Weir is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Marketing, Anthropology and Conservation, having authored 33 papers that have together received 247 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American Constitutional Law and Politics (10 papers), Race, History, and American Society (9 papers), American History and Culture (8 papers), Colonialism, slavery, and trade (3 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (2 papers), American Environmental and Regional History (2 papers), Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History (2 papers) and Architecture, Design, and Social History (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (81 citations), Archeology (8 citations), Marketing (42 citations), Political Science and International Relations (73 citations) and Cultural Studies (21 citations). Robert M. Weir has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Daniel C. Littlefield, Peter H. Wood, James A. Henretta, George C. Rogers, Betty Wood, John F. Cherry, James Kirby Martin, Gordon S. Wood, Russell F. Weigley and William Pencak. Their work appears in journals such as The William and Mary Quarterly, The Journal of Southern History, Labor History, Journal of American History and The Journal of Interdisciplinary History.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.