Robert M. McFatter

25 papers receiving 594 citations

Peers

Robert M. McFatter
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Applied Psychology 78
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 167
  • Clinical Psychology 237
  • Social Psychology 220
  • Pharmacy 30
Replace Peter A. Caprariello with:
Peter A. Caprariello United States
Gayle R. Bessenoff United States
Karen M. Simon United States
Ilmo van der Löwe United Kingdom
Belén López‐Pérez United Kingdom
Frederick G. Grieve United States
Daria C. Lysy Canada
Robert Hallett United Kingdom
Danu Anthony Stinson Canada
Alison Jane Martingano United States
Robert M. McFatter relative to Peter A. Caprariello United States Peter A. Caprariello's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Peter A. Caprariello · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert M. McFatter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert M. McFatter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert M. McFatter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert M. McFatter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert M. McFatter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert M. McFatter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert M. McFatter. The network helps show where Robert M. McFatter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Robert M. McFatter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert M. McFatter Line = papers co-authored together Robert M. McFatter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1989108
2 197982
3 197871
4 198259
5 199458
6 199452
7 201236
8 200335
9 198729
10 199826
11 200124
12 198610
13 198710
14 20069
15 20178
16 19826
17 19785
18 20154
19 20184
20 19824

About Robert M. McFatter

Robert M. McFatter is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 25 papers that have together received 651 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (4 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (3 papers), Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research (3 papers), Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (3 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers), Labor market dynamics and wage inequality (3 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (3 papers) and Advanced Statistical Methods and Models (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (78 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (167 citations), Clinical Psychology (237 citations), Social Psychology (220 citations) and Pharmacy (30 citations). Robert M. McFatter has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Daniel J. Taylor, James R. Clopton, Harry F. Gollob, Robert K. Bothwell, Yang Yang, Linda A. Foley, Claude G. Čech and Paula D. Zeanah. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Psychological Bulletin, Personality and Individual Differences and Journal of Applied Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact