Robert Kirk
Impact in
-
- Philosophy and History of Science
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Papers in
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science 10
-
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 4
- Co-authors
- Jeffrey Poland (1 shared paper)Janet E. Squires (1 shared paper)Peter Carruthers (1 shared paper)Robert Brandom (1 shared paper)Yiwei Chen (2 shared papers)Stathis Psillos (1 shared paper)Jiaxi Wang (1 shared paper)Akeel Bilgrami (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Philosophical Quarterly (6 papers)Analysis (5 papers)Mind (4 papers)Synthese (3 papers)Australasian Journal of Philosophy (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Robert Kirk
43 papers receiving 945 citations
Robert Kirk's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
- History and Philosophy of Science 159
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 343
- Philosophy 228
- General Decision Sciences 31
- Safety Research 124
Countries citing papers authored by Robert Kirk
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Kirk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Kirk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Kirk more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Kirk
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Kirk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Kirk. The network helps show where Robert Kirk may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert Kirk, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CONVENTION: A PHILOSOPHICAL STUDY Hit paper breakdown → | 1970 | 657 |
| 2 | 1996 | 60 | |
| 3 | 1974 | 55 | |
| 4 | 2005 | 49 | |
| 5 | 1992 | 41 | |
| 6 | 1974 | 29 | |
| 7 | 2014 | 18 | |
| 8 | 2002 | 13 | |
| 9 | 1996 | 12 | |
| 10 | 2012 | 9 | |
| 11 | 1996 | 8 | |
| 12 | 1994 | 8 | |
| 13 | 2007 | 8 | |
| 14 | 1996 | 7 | |
| 15 | 1999 | 7 | |
| 16 | 1979 | 6 | |
| 17 | 1967 | 5 | |
| 18 | 2013 | 5 | |
| 19 | 1973 | 5 | |
| 20 | 1969 | 5 |
About Robert Kirk
Robert Kirk is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science, Cultural Studies and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 46 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (10 papers), Gothic Literature and Media Analysis (4 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (4 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (4 papers), Psychedelics and Drug Studies (2 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (2 papers), Aging and Gerontology Research (2 papers) and Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (159 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (343 citations), Philosophy (228 citations), General Decision Sciences (31 citations) and Safety Research (124 citations). Robert Kirk has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Jeffrey Poland, Janet E. Squires, Peter Carruthers, Robert Brandom, Yiwei Chen, Stathis Psillos, Jiaxi Wang, Akeel Bilgrami, Gerald Doppelt and Andrew Lang. Their work appears in journals such as The Philosophical Quarterly, Analysis, Mind, Synthese and Australasian Journal of Philosophy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.