Robert Keight
Impact in
-
- Online Learning and Analytics
- Health Informatics top 10%
Papers in
-
- Online Learning and Analytics 5
-
- Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques 7
- Data Stream Mining Techniques 2
- Topic Modeling 2
- Co-authors
- Raghad Al-Shabandar (6 shared papers)Abir Jaafar Hussain (14 shared papers)Abir Jaffar Hussain (4 shared papers)Paul Fergus (9 shared papers)Andy Laws (3 shared papers)Mohammed Khalaf (8 shared papers)Panos Liatsis (2 shared papers)Dhiya Al‐Jumeily (10 shared papers)
- Journals
- IEEE Access (2 papers)Neurocomputing (1 paper)Lecture notes in computer science (4 papers)Liverpool John Moores University (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomIraqSaudi Arabia
In The Last Decade
Robert Keight
18 papers receiving 468 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
- Computer Science Applications 235
- Health Informatics 20
- Health Information Management 54
- Artificial Intelligence 188
- Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 15
Countries citing papers authored by Robert Keight
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Keight's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Keight with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Keight more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Keight
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Keight. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Keight. The network helps show where Robert Keight may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 23 scholars most cited alongside Robert Keight, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 96 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 54 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 46 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 43 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 41 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 36 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 31 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 30 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 27 | |
| 10 | 2017 | 22 | |
| 11 | 2017 | 16 | |
| 12 | 2016 | 15 | |
| 13 | 2016 | 13 | |
| 14 | 2017 | 9 | |
| 15 | 2017 | 6 | |
| 16 | 2015 | 6 | |
| 17 | 2017 | 4 | |
| 18 | 2017 | 4 |
About Robert Keight
Robert Keight is a scholar working on Computer Science Applications, Artificial Intelligence, Genetics, Health Information Management and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 18 papers that have together received 499 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques (7 papers), Online Learning and Analytics (5 papers), Hemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders (4 papers), Data Stream Mining Techniques (2 papers), Machine Learning in Bioinformatics (2 papers), Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare (2 papers), Trigeminal Neuralgia and Treatments (2 papers) and Topic Modeling (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (235 citations), Health Informatics (20 citations), Health Information Management (54 citations), Artificial Intelligence (188 citations) and Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (15 citations). Robert Keight has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Iraq and Saudi Arabia. Frequent co-authors include Raghad Al-Shabandar, Abir Jaafar Hussain, Abir Jaffar Hussain, Paul Fergus, Andy Laws, Mohammed Khalaf, Panos Liatsis, Dhiya Al‐Jumeily, Naeem Radi and Wasiq Khan. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Access, Neurocomputing, Lecture notes in computer science and Liverpool John Moores University.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.