Robert John King

102 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Peers

Robert John King
Comparison fields: 5 of 129
  • Public Administration 311
  • Medical Terminology 19
  • Applied Psychology 320
  • Occupational Therapy 233
  • Clinical Psychology 789
Replace Barry L. Duncan with:
Barry L. Duncan United States
Julie Repper United Kingdom
Cheryl Forchuk Canada
Erna Sally Rogers United States
Peter John Huxley United Kingdom
Mark S. Salzer United States
Derek L. Milne United Kingdom
Dean L. Fixsen United States
Jerome Carson United Kingdom
Theodore Stickley United Kingdom
Robert John King relative to Barry L. Duncan United States Barry L. Duncan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.3×
Barry L. Duncan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert John King

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert John King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert John King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert John King more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert John King

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert John King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert John King. The network helps show where Robert John King may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert John King, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert John King Line = papers co-authored together Robert John King links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 107 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002576
2 2006153
3 2015122
4 2006119
5 2008106
6 200486
7 201771
8 200255
9 200354
10 200654
11 201452
12 200552
13 201249
14 202049
15 200747
16 200542
17 201137
18 199833
19 200432
20 200132

About Robert John King

Robert John King is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Occupational Therapy and General Health Professions, having authored 107 papers that have together received 2.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (14 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (14 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (12 papers), Occupational Therapy Practice and Research (12 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (11 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (9 papers), Psychiatric care and mental health services (8 papers) and Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (311 citations), Medical Terminology (19 citations), Applied Psychology (320 citations), Occupational Therapy (233 citations) and Clinical Psychology (789 citations). Robert John King has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Chris Lloyd, Lesley Chenoweth, Matthew Bambling, Wendy Reid, Jayne A. Orr, David Charles Chant, Hazel Bassett, Kryss T. McKenna, Geoffrey Waghorn and Geoff Waghorn. Their work appears in journals such as Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, British Journal of Occupational Therapy, Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, Australian Psychologist and Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact