Robert J. Silverman

52 papers receiving 422 citations

Peers

Robert J. Silverman
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
  • Algebra and Number Theory 72
  • Mathematical Physics 107
  • History and Philosophy of Science 46
  • Applied Mathematics 83
  • Music 21
Replace Constance L. Reid with:
Constance L. Reid United States
David Eugene Smith United States
Edward Stein United States
Judith Victor Grabiner United States
Nathanial P. Brown United States
Günter Törner Germany
Carl Winsløw Denmark
Edward Barbeau Canada
J. Coates United Kingdom
José Sanmartín Esplugues Spain
Robert J. Silverman relative to Constance L. Reid United States Constance L. Reid's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8.3×
Constance L. Reid · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert J. Silverman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert J. Silverman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert J. Silverman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert J. Silverman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert J. Silverman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert J. Silverman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert J. Silverman. The network helps show where Robert J. Silverman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Robert J. Silverman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert J. Silverman Line = papers co-authored together Robert J. Silverman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199886
2 201265
3 198745
4 199938
5 199324
6 198524
7 195624
8 199624
9 195919
10 196718
11 195913
12 195613
13 199312
14 198212
15 196712
16 195911
17 195911
18 195611
19 195911
20 19669

About Robert J. Silverman

Robert J. Silverman is a scholar working on Mathematical Physics, Algebra and Number Theory, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Education and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 57 papers that have together received 602 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Banach Space Theory (6 papers), scientometrics and bibliometrics research (4 papers), Higher Education Governance and Development (4 papers), Advanced Topics in Algebra (4 papers), Evaluation of Teaching Practices (4 papers), Rings, Modules, and Algebras (3 papers), Functional Equations Stability Results (3 papers) and Optimization and Variational Analysis (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Algebra and Number Theory (72 citations), Mathematical Physics (107 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (46 citations), Applied Mathematics (83 citations) and Music (21 citations). Robert J. Silverman has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Thomas L. Hankins, David F. Channell, Christopher Peterson, Margaret McCartney, Patrick William Corrigan, Marie A. Brunet, John R. Tomlinson, John R. Cosgrove, James Andrew Stephenson and Brett Buican. Their work appears in journals such as Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, The Journal of Higher Education, Science Communication and Research in Higher Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact