Robert Hurling

3.6k citations
44 papers · 2.5k · h-index 24

Impact in

Papers in

Robert Hurling

44 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Peers

Robert Hurling
Comparison fields: 5 of 145
  • Applied Psychology 566
  • Social Psychology 659
  • Clinical Psychology 370
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 190
  • General Health Professions 406
Replace Carole A. Bisogni with:
Carole A. Bisogni United States
Tessa M. Pollard United Kingdom
Ellen van Kleef Netherlands
Claude Fischler France
Jeanne P. Goldberg United States
Michael D. Basil Canada
Xiaofei Xie China
Britta Renner Germany
Susie C. Sympson United States
Hye Kyung Kim Singapore
Robert Hurling relative to Carole A. Bisogni United States Carole A. Bisogni's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Carole A. Bisogni · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Hurling

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Hurling's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Hurling with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Hurling more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Hurling

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Hurling. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Hurling. The network helps show where Robert Hurling may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert Hurling, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert Hurling Line = papers co-authored together Robert Hurling links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007422
2 2010372
3 2009309
4 1996126
5 2010126
6 2008100
7 201099
8 200397
9 200771
10 200664
11 201258
12 200851
13 200845
14 200941
15 200741
16 201139
17 201638
18 201434
19 199633
20 201030

About Robert Hurling

Robert Hurling is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 44 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Behavioral Health and Interventions (25 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (8 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (6 papers), Environmental Education and Sustainability (4 papers), Physical Activity and Health (4 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (3 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (3 papers) and Mental Health Research Topics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (566 citations), Social Psychology (659 citations), Clinical Psychology (370 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (190 citations) and General Health Professions (406 citations). Robert Hurling has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Marco Perugini, Andrew Prestwich, P. Alex Linley, John Maltby, Alex M. Wood, Peter Murray, B. W. Fairley, Todd B. Kashdan, Gabrielle Osborne and Tina Hurst. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Medical Internet Research, Health Psychology, British Journal of Health Psychology, Psychology and Health and Personality and Individual Differences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact