Robert Glück

3.0k citations
125 papers · 2.3k · h-index 29

Impact in

Papers in

Robert Glück

119 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

Robert Glück
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Hardware and Architecture 729
  • Software 382
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 1.3k
  • Artificial Intelligence 1.9k
  • Computer Networks and Communications 356
Replace Ralf Hinze with:
Ralf Hinze Germany
Oleg Kiselyov Japan
Jean-Christophe Filliâtre France
John Launchbury United States
Martin Hofmann Germany
Helmut Seidl Germany
Adam Chlipala United States
Conor McBride United Kingdom
Matt Kaufmann United States
David Monniaux France
Robert Glück relative to Ralf Hinze Germany Ralf Hinze's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Ralf Hinze · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Glück

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Glück's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Glück with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Glück more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Glück

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Glück. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Glück. The network helps show where Robert Glück may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert Glück, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert Glück Line = papers co-authored together Robert Glück links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 125 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1996141
2 2007102
3 199593
4 200891
5 199390
6 201078
7 200077
8 199972
9 199461
10 199451
11
199748
12 199646
13 200744
14 200242
15 200341
16 201240
17 200839
18 201538
19
Partial Evaluation of Numerical Programs in Fortran.
199436
20 201136

About Robert Glück

Robert Glück is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Hardware and Architecture, Computer Networks and Communications and Information Systems, having authored 125 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Logic, programming, and type systems (66 papers), Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques (39 papers), Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms (32 papers), Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture (29 papers), Formal Methods in Verification (23 papers), Software Engineering Research (16 papers), Algorithms and Data Compression (14 papers) and semigroups and automata theory (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Hardware and Architecture (729 citations), Software (382 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (1.3k citations), Artificial Intelligence (1.9k citations) and Computer Networks and Communications (356 citations). Robert Glück has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, Japan and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Tetsuo Yokoyama, Holger Bock Axelsen, Morten Heine Sørensen, Jesper Jørgensen, Michael Kirkedal Thomsen, N. D. Jones, Bern Martens, Robert Zöchling, Neil D. Jones and Yoshihiko Futamura. Their work appears in journals such as Lecture notes in computer science, ACM SIGPLAN Notices, Theoretical Computer Science, Journal of Functional Programming and LISP and Symbolic Computation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact