Robert G. Large

38 papers receiving 636 citations

Peers

Robert G. Large
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Pharmacology 330
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 84
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 165
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 175
  • Complementary and Manual Therapy 12
Replace Jeffrey Dersh with:
Jeffrey Dersh United States
Rudy Severeijns Netherlands
Steven F. Brena United States
TROY L. THOMPSON United States
Charles W. Quimby United States
Kenneth R. Lofland United States
Hampton J. Atkinson United States
LisaCaitlin M. Perri United States
Tormod Landmark Norway
Douglas J. French Canada
Robert G. Large relative to Jeffrey Dersh United States Jeffrey Dersh's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Jeffrey Dersh · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert G. Large

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert G. Large's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert G. Large with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert G. Large more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert G. Large

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert G. Large. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert G. Large. The network helps show where Robert G. Large may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Robert G. Large, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert G. Large Line = papers co-authored together Robert G. Large links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199183
2 199272
3 198662
4 198046
5 199445
6 199042
7 200539
8 199636
9 199535
10 199321
11 199721
12 199519
13 198319
14 199418
15 199417
16 199512
17 198911
18 198510
19 19969
20 19978

About Robert G. Large

Robert G. Large is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, having authored 40 papers that have together received 698 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (17 papers), Pain Management and Placebo Effect (15 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (8 papers), Pediatric Pain Management Techniques (8 papers), Pain Management and Opioid Use (6 papers), Cognitive and psychological constructs research (4 papers), Pain Management and Treatment (2 papers) and Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (330 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (84 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (165 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (175 citations) and Complementary and Manual Therapy (12 citations). Robert G. Large has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Tannis M. Laidlaw, Stephan A. Schug, Jenny Strong, Gail S. Elkind, Roger J. Booth, John Bushnell, Roderick Ashton, J. Strong, Malcolm H. Johnson and Keith J. Petrie. Their work appears in journals such as Pain, Clinical Journal of Pain, Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, Journal of Psychosomatic Research and Health Care Analysis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact