Robert E. Duke
Impact in
-
- Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies
- Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
Papers in
-
- Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies 6
- Advanced Chemical Physics Studies 3
-
- Protein Structure and Dynamics 6
- DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry 3
- Co-authors
- David S. Cerutti (3 shared papers)Terry P. Lybrand (2 shared papers)Thomas A. Darden (4 shared papers)G. Andrés Cisneros (4 shared papers)Lee G. Pedersen (8 shared papers)David A. Case (1 shared paper)L. Perera (6 shared papers)Jean‐Philip Piquemal (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Computational Chemistry (3 papers)Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation (3 papers)Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis (2 papers)Journal of Molecular Modeling (2 papers)Theoretical Chemistry Accounts (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesFranceChina
In The Last Decade
Robert E. Duke
16 papers receiving 601 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
- Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 61
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 166
- Molecular Biology 341
- Hematology 46
- Spectroscopy 64
Countries citing papers authored by Robert E. Duke
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert E. Duke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert E. Duke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert E. Duke more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert E. Duke
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert E. Duke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert E. Duke. The network helps show where Robert E. Duke may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert E. Duke, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2009 | 135 | |
| 2 | 2009 | 85 | |
| 3 | 2010 | 73 | |
| 4 | 2008 | 73 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 63 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 28 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 25 | |
| 8 | 2011 | 24 | |
| 9 | 2008 | 22 | |
| 10 | 2003 | 20 | |
| 11 | 2010 | 19 | |
| 12 | 2019 | 13 | |
| 13 | 2009 | 13 | |
| 14 | 2010 | 11 | |
| 15 | 2008 | 5 | |
| 16 | 2004 | 2 | |
| 17 | 2020 | 0 |
About Robert E. Duke
Robert E. Duke is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Molecular Biology, Hematology, Spectroscopy and Materials Chemistry, having authored 17 papers that have together received 611 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (6 papers), Protein Structure and Dynamics (6 papers), Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms (5 papers), Hemophilia Treatment and Research (4 papers), DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry (3 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (3 papers), Blood properties and coagulation (2 papers) and Enzyme Structure and Function (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (61 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (166 citations), Molecular Biology (341 citations), Hematology (46 citations) and Spectroscopy (64 citations). Robert E. Duke has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and China. Frequent co-authors include David S. Cerutti, Terry P. Lybrand, Thomas A. Darden, G. Andrés Cisneros, Lee G. Pedersen, David A. Case, L. Perera, Jean‐Philip Piquemal, Hao Fan and Michael J. Schnieders. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Computational Chemistry, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, Journal of Molecular Modeling and Theoretical Chemistry Accounts.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.