Robert D. Rupert

2.8k citations
40 papers · 1.1k · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Robert D. Rupert

38 papers receiving 965 citations

Peers

Robert D. Rupert
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • History and Philosophy of Science 227
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 740
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 294
  • Philosophy 249
  • Social Psychology 294
Replace Richard Menary with:
Richard Menary Australia
Michael Wheeler United Kingdom
N. J. H. Dent United Kingdom
Achim Stephan Germany
Daniel A. Weiskopf United States
Thomas Reid United States
Jerrold Levinson United States
Christopher Gauker United States
Gareth Evans United Kingdom
Eric Mandelbaum United States
Robert D. Rupert relative to Richard Menary Australia Richard Menary's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Richard Menary · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert D. Rupert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert D. Rupert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert D. Rupert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert D. Rupert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert D. Rupert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert D. Rupert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert D. Rupert. The network helps show where Robert D. Rupert may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert D. Rupert, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert D. Rupert Line = papers co-authored together Robert D. Rupert links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004341
2 2009251
3 2012108
4
Supersizing the Mind: Embodiment, Action, and Cognitive Extension
200956
5 200532
6 201030
7 201326
8 201823
9 200822
10 199922
11 201120
12 201116
13 200113
14 200612
15 200111
16 199810
17 198310
18 20209
19 20087
20 20186

About Robert D. Rupert

Robert D. Rupert is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy and Social Psychology, having authored 40 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (18 papers), Embodied and Extended Cognition (18 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (15 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (8 papers), Action Observation and Synchronization (4 papers), Cognitive Science and Education Research (3 papers), Social Representations and Identity (2 papers) and Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (227 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (740 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (294 citations), Philosophy (249 citations) and Social Psychology (294 citations). Robert D. Rupert has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and India. Frequent co-authors include J. Adam Carter, Aashish D. Bhatt, Enver Özer, Erin Healy, Amit Agrawal, Manisha H. Shah, Marcelo Bonomi, Steven Sun, James W. Rocco and Paul Monk. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Philosophy, Synthese, Cognitive Systems Research, Review of Philosophy and Psychology and Journal of Clinical Oncology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact