Robert D. Chirico

148 papers receiving 4.4k citations

Peers

Robert D. Chirico
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 1.2k
  • Filtration and Separation 299
  • Catalysis 702
  • Organic Chemistry 2.7k
  • Biomedical Engineering 2.5k
Replace Shiang‐Tai Lin with:
Shiang‐Tai Lin Taiwan
Christian Boned France
Vladimir Diky United States
Lawrence A. Woolf Australia
Yang‐Xin Yu China
Jeffrey J. Potoff United States
Marcus G. Martin United States
J. H. Dymond United Kingdom
Gustavo A. Iglesias‐Silva Mexico
John P. O’Connell United States
Robert D. Chirico relative to Shiang‐Tai Lin Taiwan Shiang‐Tai Lin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Shiang‐Tai Lin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert D. Chirico

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert D. Chirico's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert D. Chirico with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert D. Chirico more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert D. Chirico

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert D. Chirico. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert D. Chirico. The network helps show where Robert D. Chirico may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert D. Chirico, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert D. Chirico Line = papers co-authored together Robert D. Chirico links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 149 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007233
2 2003222
3 2005156
4 2010123
5 1994120
6 1988114
7 1989108
8 1989107
9 2013102
10 2009102
11 2009101
12 199680
13 199779
14 199674
15 199773
16 199273
17 200272
18 199671
19 199765
20 199363

About Robert D. Chirico

Robert D. Chirico is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Biomedical Engineering, Materials Chemistry, Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes and Catalysis, having authored 149 papers that have together received 4.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chemical Thermodynamics and Molecular Structure (113 papers), Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics (79 papers), Thermodynamic properties of mixtures (42 papers), Thermal and Kinetic Analysis (30 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (13 papers), Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions (9 papers), thermodynamics and calorimetric analyses (8 papers) and Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (1.2k citations), Filtration and Separation (299 citations), Catalysis (702 citations), Organic Chemistry (2.7k citations) and Biomedical Engineering (2.5k citations). Robert D. Chirico has collaborated with scholars based in United States, New Zealand and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include W.V. Steele, S.E. Knipmeyer, A. Nguyen, Vladimir Diky, Michael Frenkel, Chris D. Muzny, Kenneth N. Marsh, Andrei F. Kazakov, Joseph W. Magee and Edgar F. Westrum. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Chemical Thermodynamics, Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, Pure and Applied Chemistry and Inorganic Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact