W.B. Collier

821 citations
19 papers · 724 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

W.B. Collier

19 papers receiving 675 citations

Peers

W.B. Collier
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 156
  • Organic Chemistry 353
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 190
  • Spectroscopy 155
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 52
Replace Scott E. Boesch with:
Scott E. Boesch United States
Yoshinori Nibu Japan
M. A. Kovner Russia
Beatriz H. Cardelino United States
B. N. Cyvin Norway
W. C. Harris United States
M.P. Marzocchi Italy
G. Jalsovszky Hungary
Г.М. Курамшина Russia
I. Trabjerg Denmark
W.B. Collier relative to Scott E. Boesch United States Scott E. Boesch's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Scott E. Boesch · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by W.B. Collier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of W.B. Collier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W.B. Collier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W.B. Collier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by W.B. Collier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by W.B. Collier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W.B. Collier. The network helps show where W.B. Collier may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside W.B. Collier, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with W.B. Collier Line = papers co-authored together W.B. Collier links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 1988114
2 199594
3 201583
4 198483
5 199752
6 199951
7 198851
8 200243
9 199541
10 199426
11 199522
12 198116
13 199615
14 198014
15 20236
16 20155
17
Assessment of thermodynamic data and needs, including their economic impact, for development of new fossil fuel refining processes
19864
18 20163
19 20211

About W.B. Collier

W.B. Collier is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Spectroscopy, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, having authored 19 papers that have together received 724 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nonlinear Optical Materials Research (7 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (6 papers), Molecular spectroscopy and chirality (5 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (5 papers), Free Radicals and Antioxidants (5 papers), Chemical Thermodynamics and Molecular Structure (5 papers), Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies (4 papers) and Molecular Spectroscopy and Structure (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (156 citations), Organic Chemistry (353 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (190 citations), Spectroscopy (155 citations) and Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (52 citations). W.B. Collier has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Türkiye and Hungary. Frequent co-authors include T. D. Klots, J. Paul Devlin, Gary Ritzhaupt, W.V. Steele, B.E. Gammon, Robert D. Chirico, A. Nguyen, N. K. Smith, Simon E. Lappi and Donald G. Archer. Their work appears in journals such as Spectrochimica Acta Part A Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy, The Journal of Chemical Physics, The Journal of Physical Chemistry, Chemical Physics Letters and The Journal of Physical Chemistry A.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact