Robert Claycomb

996 citations
27 papers · 872 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Robert Claycomb

27 papers receiving 855 citations

Peers

Robert Claycomb
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 109
  • Developmental Neuroscience 95
  • Biological Psychiatry 37
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 195
  • Neurology 73
Replace Qingwen Zeng with:
Qingwen Zeng China
Farhad Ghoddoussi United States
Hai T. Nguyen United States
Sixun Yu China
Guohong Cai China
Hidetaka Yamada Japan
Elisa Bisicchia Italy
Keke Ren China
Isabelle Leroux‐Nicollet France
Robert Claycomb relative to Qingwen Zeng China Qingwen Zeng's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Qingwen Zeng · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Claycomb

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Claycomb's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Claycomb with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Claycomb more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Claycomb

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Claycomb. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Claycomb. The network helps show where Robert Claycomb may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert Claycomb, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert Claycomb Line = papers co-authored together Robert Claycomb links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Interleukin-1β in Central Nervous System Injury and Repair.
2012108
2 2011103
3 2004101
4 200265
5 200152
6 200343
7 200443
8 200741
9 201140
10 200434
11 200934
12 200831
13 201124
14 200323
15 200321
16 200218
17 201017
18 201016
19 200214
20 201613

About Robert Claycomb

Robert Claycomb is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cancer Research, Behavioral Neuroscience and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, having authored 27 papers that have together received 872 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study (6 papers), Adipose Tissue and Metabolism (5 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (5 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (4 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (4 papers), Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism (4 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (3 papers) and Hormonal Regulation and Hypertension (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (109 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (95 citations), Biological Psychiatry (37 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (195 citations) and Neurology (73 citations). Robert Claycomb has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Slovakia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include T.C. Tai, Dona L. Wong, Sandra J. Hewett, Douglas E. Raines, Stuart A. Forman, Nicole A. Jackman, Richard Květňanský, Song Her, James A. Hewett and S. E. Pfeiffer. Their work appears in journals such as Anesthesia & Analgesia, Molecular Pharmacology, Journal of Neurochemistry, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences and Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact