Robert C. Smith

4.8k citations
122 papers · 3.5k · h-index 33

Impact in

Papers in

Robert C. Smith

117 papers receiving 3.3k citations

Peers

Robert C. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 139
  • Biological Psychiatry 201
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 1.1k
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 723
  • Neurology 227
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 396
Replace Ved Chauhan with:
Ved Chauhan United States
Abha Chauhan United States
M. Gerlach Germany
Antonio Lucacchini Italy
Andrew L. Stoll United States
Seppo Kaakkola Finland
Stephanie R. Rainey‐Smith Australia
Jae Hoon Cheong South Korea
Mario Baraldi Italy
Sujung Yoon South Korea
Robert C. Smith relative to Ved Chauhan United States Ved Chauhan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Ved Chauhan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert C. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert C. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert C. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert C. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert C. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert C. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert C. Smith. The network helps show where Robert C. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert C. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert C. Smith Line = papers co-authored together Robert C. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 122 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1977188
2 1978182
3 2015150
4 2005149
5
Hyperglycemia associated with the use of atypical antipsychotics.
2001130
6 1980120
7 1987113
8 200999
9 199793
10 200988
11 197688
12 197777
13 199875
14 199474
15 200470
16 197767
17 199165
18 198457
19 201654
20 200553

About Robert C. Smith

Robert C. Smith is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Molecular Biology, Physiology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Neurology, having authored 122 papers that have together received 3.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (36 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (11 papers), Tryptophan and brain disorders (11 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (10 papers), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (10 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (7 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (6 papers) and Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (201 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (1.1k citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (723 citations), Neurology (227 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (396 citations). Robert C. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Germany. Frequent co-authors include John M. Davis, Carol A. Tamminga, Jean‐Pierre Lindenmayer, Chandra H. Misra, Henry Sershen, Herbert Y. Meltzer, Harnath Shelat, Ramesh Arora, Martin Schaffer and Ábel Lajtha. Their work appears in journals such as Psychiatry Research, Psychopharmacology, Schizophrenia Research, Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics and The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact