Robert C. Smith

4.8k citations
130 papers · 3.8k · h-index 33

Impact in

Papers in

Robert C. Smith

125 papers receiving 3.5k citations

Peers

Robert C. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 142
  • Biological Psychiatry 215
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 1.2k
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 803
  • Neurology 236
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 440
Replace Andrew L. Stoll with:
Andrew L. Stoll United States
Seppo Kaakkola Finland
Ved Chauhan United States
M. Gerlach Germany
Abha Chauhan United States
Antonio Lucacchini Italy
Jae Hoon Cheong South Korea
Silvio Caccia Italy
Mario Baraldi Italy
Stephanie R. Rainey‐Smith Australia
Robert C. Smith relative to Andrew L. Stoll United States Andrew L. Stoll's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.9×
Andrew L. Stoll · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert C. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert C. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert C. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert C. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert C. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert C. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert C. Smith. The network helps show where Robert C. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert C. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert C. Smith Line = papers co-authored together Robert C. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 130 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1978210
2 1977200
3 2015156
4 2005153
5
Hyperglycemia associated with the use of atypical antipsychotics.
2001136
6 1980134
7 1987113
8 2009107
9 1997106
10 1976103
11 200990
12 197780
13 199879
14 197776
15 199476
16 200475
17 199171
18 198466
19 200559
20 198457

About Robert C. Smith

Robert C. Smith is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Molecular Biology, Physiology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 130 papers that have together received 3.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (38 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (11 papers), Tryptophan and brain disorders (11 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (10 papers), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (10 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (8 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (8 papers) and Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (215 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (1.2k citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (803 citations), Neurology (236 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (440 citations). Robert C. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Germany. Frequent co-authors include John M. Davis, Carol A. Tamminga, Jean‐Pierre Lindenmayer, Chandra H. Misra, Martin Schaffer, Harnath Shelat, Henry Sershen, Ramesh Arora, Herbert Y. Meltzer and Ábel Lajtha. Their work appears in journals such as Psychiatry Research, Psychopharmacology, Schizophrenia Research, Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics and The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact