Robert C. James

43 papers receiving 937 citations

Peers

Robert C. James
Comparison fields: 5 of 115
  • Mathematical Physics 834
  • Applied Mathematics 499
  • Geometry and Topology 368
  • Statistics and Probability 228
  • Algebra and Number Theory 124
Replace W. A. J. Luxemburg with:
W. A. J. Luxemburg United States
M. Landsberg Germany
C. Ryll–Nardzewski Poland
Kôsaku Yosida Japan
Viktor Losert Austria
Ehrhard Behrends Germany
I. J. Maddox United Kingdom
Robert Fefferman United States
Ján Andres Czechia
Thomas Ward United Kingdom
Robert C. James relative to W. A. J. Luxemburg United States W. A. J. Luxemburg's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
W. A. J. Luxemburg · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert C. James

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert C. James's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert C. James with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert C. James more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert C. James

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert C. James. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert C. James. The network helps show where Robert C. James may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Robert C. James, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert C. James Line = papers co-authored together Robert C. James links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1964294
2 196491
3 197478
4 195176
5 196067
6 196466
7 197262
8 199255
9 195754
10 197152
11 197245
12 195944
13 197838
14 197430
15 197218
16 197715
17 199713
18 196813
19 197111
20 19819

About Robert C. James

Robert C. James is a scholar working on Mathematical Physics, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Geometry and Topology, Applied Mathematics and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 50 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Banach Space Theory (19 papers), Cinema and Media Studies (7 papers), Optimization and Variational Analysis (7 papers), Holomorphic and Operator Theory (6 papers), Advanced Topics in Algebra (5 papers), French Historical and Cultural Studies (4 papers), Advanced Topology and Set Theory (3 papers) and Fixed Point Theorems Analysis (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Mathematical Physics (834 citations), Applied Mathematics (499 citations), Geometry and Topology (368 citations), Statistics and Probability (228 citations) and Algebra and Number Theory (124 citations). Robert C. James has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Hungary. Frequent co-authors include Mahlon M. Day, Glenn James, Juan Jorge Schäffer, J. R. Retherford, Edward J. Stanek, Stephen M. Roberts, Joana Gaspar de Freitas, Edward J. Calabrese, Seymour Goldberg and Albert Wilansky. Their work appears in journals such as Israel Journal of Mathematics, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, Historical Journal Of Film Radio and Television, Canadian Journal of Mathematics and Annals of Mathematics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact