Robert Burns

63 papers receiving 440 citations

Peers

Robert Burns
Comparison fields: 5 of 154
  • Process Chemistry and Technology 16
  • Emergency Medicine 48
  • History 50
  • Organic Chemistry 109
  • Museology 12
Replace Anthony Fletcher with:
Anthony Fletcher United Kingdom
Geoffrey Gray United States
Stephen J. O’Connor United States
Toru Tani Japan
Rachel Spronk Netherlands
Michael Cowan United States
Yuko Kimura Japan
Xiaoxia Li China
James Kearney United States
Rodney L. Taylor United States
Robert Burns relative to Anthony Fletcher United Kingdom Anthony Fletcher's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.2×
Anthony Fletcher · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Burns

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Burns's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Burns with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Burns more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Burns

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Burns. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Burns. The network helps show where Robert Burns may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert Burns, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert Burns Line = papers co-authored together Robert Burns links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 94 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199445
2
Polyester molding compounds
198241
3 198939
4
The Poems and Songs of Robert Burns
196629
5
The Great Debate on Miracles: From Joseph Glanvill to David Hume
198128
6 195628
7 199124
8
Theophylline toxicity: update.
199024
9 202323
10 201923
11 199120
12 200817
13 201915
14 198512
15 198312
16
Historiography: Critical Concepts in Historical Studies
200611
17 201111
18
Complete Poetical Works
198511
19
THE DUKE AVOCADO
19639
20 19929

About Robert Burns

Robert Burns is a scholar working on History, Molecular Biology, Oncology, Organic Chemistry and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 94 papers that have together received 550 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Scottish History and National Identity (6 papers), CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts (3 papers), Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (3 papers), Material Properties and Applications (2 papers), Linguistics and language evolution (2 papers), Asymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis (2 papers), Organometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis (2 papers) and Odor and Emission Control Technologies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Process Chemistry and Technology (16 citations), Emergency Medicine (48 citations), History (50 citations), Organic Chemistry (109 citations) and Museology (12 citations). Robert Burns has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and China. Frequent co-authors include John L. Hubbard, Robert M. Hall, Robert M. Hardaway, Oliver Goldsmith, Donald G. McKay, Owen W. Nadeau, Ruth Ann Parish, Zhen Liu, Zhenbin Chen and Juan M. Ruso. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, Immunology, JAMA, The Review of Politics and Crop Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact