The Review of Politics

1.7k papers and 7.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.7k papers published in The Review of Politics in the last decades have received a total of 7.3k indexed citations. Papers published in The Review of Politics usually cover Political Science and International Relations (832 papers), Sociology and Political Science (481 papers) and Philosophy (385 papers) specifically the topics of American Constitutional Law and Politics (363 papers), Political Theory and Influence (203 papers) and Development of Political Thought in Early Modern Era (178 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Review of Politics are Philippe C. Schmitter, Joseph H. Carens, Sanford Lakoff, Éric Voegelin, Hannah Arendt, Gerald Rosenberg, Robert Mayer, Aaron Wíldavsky, Andrew F. March and Jeremy Waldron.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in The Review of Politics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Review of Politics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Review of Politics.

Countries where authors publish in The Review of Politics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Review of Politics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Review of Politics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Review of Politics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025