Robert Borofsky

974 citations
22 papers · 474 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Robert Borofsky

20 papers receiving 331 citations

Peers

Robert Borofsky
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Anthropology 146
  • Geography, Planning and Development 57
  • Cultural Studies 36
  • Sociology and Political Science 174
  • Demography 47
Replace Robert Parkin with:
Robert Parkin United Kingdom
T. M. S. Evens United States
Thomas Biolsi United States
Ivan Brady United States
Michel Panoff Morocco
James A. Boon United States
Elvin Hatch United States
Frank A. Salamone United States
Rena Lederman United States
Sasha Newell United States
Robert Borofsky relative to Robert Parkin United Kingdom Robert Parkin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Robert Parkin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Borofsky

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Borofsky's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Borofsky with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Borofsky more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Borofsky

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Borofsky. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Borofsky. The network helps show where Robert Borofsky may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Robert Borofsky, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert Borofsky Line = papers co-authored together Robert Borofsky links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1996137
2 198869
3 199748
4 200142
5 200236
6
Yanomami: The Fierce Controversy and What We Can Learn from It
200535
7 198827
8 200024
9 198312
10 201910
11 20199
12 19889
13 20005
14 19892
15 19892
16 20202
17 20201
18
Review of History’s Anthropology: The Death of William Gooch, by Greg Dening
19901
19 20151
20 20001

About Robert Borofsky

Robert Borofsky is a scholar working on Geography, Planning and Development, General Health Professions, Anthropology, Demography and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 22 papers that have together received 474 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies (4 papers), Indigenous Studies and Ecology (3 papers), Island Studies and Pacific Affairs (3 papers), Anthropology: Ethics, History, Culture (3 papers), Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy (1 paper), Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies (1 paper), Museums and Cultural Heritage (1 paper) and Diverse Musicological Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (146 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (57 citations), Cultural Studies (36 citations), Sociology and Political Science (174 citations) and Demography (47 citations). Robert Borofsky has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Norway and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Stephen Nugent, Judith Huntsman, Richard J. Parmentier, Richard A. Shweder, Lars Rodseth, Fredrik Barth, James Clifford, Terence Turner, Kim Hill and Raymond Hames. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, American Anthropologist, Anthropological Quarterly, Journal of Pacific History and Current Anthropology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact