Robert Borofsky

974 citations
25 papers · 577 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Robert Borofsky

22 papers receiving 395 citations

Peers

Robert Borofsky
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Anthropology 183
  • Geography, Planning and Development 65
  • Cultural Studies 44
  • Sociology and Political Science 225
  • Demography 55
Replace Michel Panoff with:
Michel Panoff Morocco
Irving Hexham Canada
Rena Lederman United States
Jeanne Favret-Saada France
Elvin Hatch United States
Don Seeman United States
Roxana Waterson Singapore
T. M. S. Evens United States
E. Valentine Daniel United States
Mary Weismantel United States
Robert Borofsky relative to Michel Panoff Morocco Michel Panoff's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Michel Panoff · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Borofsky

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Borofsky's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Borofsky with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Borofsky more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Borofsky

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Borofsky. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Borofsky. The network helps show where Robert Borofsky may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Robert Borofsky, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert Borofsky Line = papers co-authored together Robert Borofsky links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1996184
2 198870
3 199753
4 200152
5 200246
6
Yanomami: The Fierce Controversy and What We Can Learn from It
200540
7 198830
8 200029
9 198318
10 201913
11 201912
12 19889
13 20005
14 19893
15 19892
16 20202
17 20172
18
Review of History’s Anthropology: The Death of William Gooch, by Greg Dening
19902
19 20201
20 20151

About Robert Borofsky

Robert Borofsky is a scholar working on Geography, Planning and Development, General Health Professions, Anthropology, Demography and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 25 papers that have together received 577 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies (4 papers), Indigenous Studies and Ecology (3 papers), Island Studies and Pacific Affairs (3 papers), Anthropology: Ethics, History, Culture (3 papers), Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy (1 paper), Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies (1 paper), Museums and Cultural Heritage (1 paper) and Diverse Musicological Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (183 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (65 citations), Cultural Studies (44 citations), Sociology and Political Science (225 citations) and Demography (55 citations). Robert Borofsky has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Norway and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Stephen Nugent, Judith Huntsman, Richard J. Parmentier, Lars Rodseth, Fredrik Barth, Richard A. Shweder, James Clifford, Bruce Albert, Kim Hill and Terence Turner. Their work appears in journals such as American Anthropologist, Anthropological Quarterly, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, Ethnohistory and Current Anthropology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact